A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Omega level mutant.
-
The fact that Trevor's tweet storm and Nate's countertweet both landed immediately in the NYTimes is rather concerning at least to me.
-
Link to NYT article? That is SUPER concerning.
-
@Andrew Rambaut I.e., https://twitter.com/ChuziChips
-
2020-06-08 08:48
Andrew Rambaut
@Andrew Rambaut "no you smell"
-
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/07/us/Protest-coronavirus-george-floyd.html
-
Amy Harmon is a national correspondent, covering the intersection of science and society. She has won two PulitzerPrizes, for her series "The DNA Age", and as part of a team for the series "How Race Is Lived inAmerica." @amy_harmon • Facebook
-
Amy Harmon - yes, she should know better. It's worth pointing out the Trevor isn't an epidemiologist - same for Nate,myself, and many others - the only one who's an epidemiologist in that article is Marc. One thing is to report basedon tweets (which is wrong), another is doing it when the person isn't a subject-matter expert - I find that really problematic, especially for something this important. Science by Twitter is not the way to deal with these types ofquestions...
-
I still see the Forbes article - https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidnikel/2020/06/07/norway-scientist-claims-report-proves-coronavirus-was-lab-made/#46c2c45b121d