Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.61 [SLACK_000275] · slack_pm:msg:00611

Date: 2020-06-08 08:03
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

Gonna really have to take a look at this whole science by twitter thing. As for the NatMed paper attacks - you'll know you've actually made it when a bunch of "dudes" think they can make their careers by trashing you.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-06-08 08:03 Robert F. Garry

Gonna really have to take a look at this whole science by twitter thing. As for the NatMed paper attacks - you'll know you've actually made it when a bunch of "dudes" think they can make their careers by trashing you.
2020-06-08 08:20 Andrew Rambaut open

For those who actually use their photos there is a definite 'look' for these people.
2020-06-08 08:31 Robert F. Garry open

Seems the Forbes article has been yanked... [shared file(s): image.png]
2020-06-08 08:36 Andrew Rambaut open

It got yanked almost immediately after Eddie posted his tweet last night.
2020-06-08 08:36 Andrew Rambaut open

Such power

Full conversation →