Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.42 [SLACK_000256] · slack_pm:msg:00410

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

I'm pretty sure Oli is one smug bastard right now :wink:

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-05-26 19:28 Edward C. Holmes open

Actually, I've already done Andrew a solid: Carl Zimmer sent me the paper (which I had not seen) and then Trevor'stweetfest. I obviously said very nice things about the paper...
2020-05-26 19:51 Kristian G. Andersen open

Yeah, I talked to Carl too - was really difficult to balance being diplomatic and then telling him that one has to becareful making conclusions... I thought my quote in Stat was nice and to the point though :wink: [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2020-05-26 at 7.51.11 PM.png]
2020-05-26 19:52 Edward C. Holmes open

Fuck, that was my line!
2020-05-26 19:54 Kristian G. Andersen open

Sorry buddy, I got there first. (actually my real quote was "Yes" - so that would have been shorter... She asked me ifI thought the Worobey study was convincing and well-supported - I felt a simply 'yes' was sufficient...)
2020-05-26 19:55 Kristian G. Andersen

I'm pretty sure Oli is one smug bastard right now :wink: