Chat message

Slack / Private Message Drop, p.29 [SLACK_000243] · slack_pm:msg:00293

Date: 2020-05-16 04:54
Type: chat message · slack
recipient: Kristian G. Andersen, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
speaker: Robert F. Garry

Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.

This sentence in question is just about as careful and nuanced as it could be. "we do not believe" ergo this is our opinion. "plausible" means: sure we can't rule out that the Red Army created this in a lab with help from 9 foot tallgreen spacewomen, but sticking to reality it's very unlikely.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2020-05-16 04:49 Robert F. Garry open

Me neither, but I could have missed it somewhere in the barrage of "do you believe Fair?" emails. Answer no BTW. "_However, since we observed all notable SARS-CoV-2 features, including the optimized RBD and polybasic cleavage site, in related coronaviruses in nature, we do not believe that *any* type of laboratory-based scenario isplausible."_
2020-05-16 04:54 Robert F. Garry

This sentence in question is just about as careful and nuanced as it could be. "we do not believe" ergo this is our opinion. "plausible" means: sure we can't rule out that the Red Army created this in a lab with help from 9 foot tallgreen spacewomen, but sticking to reality it's very unlikely.

Full conversation →