Chat message
Slack / Private Message Drop, p.23 [SLACK_000237] · slack_pm:msg:00234
Page text: p.23 · original PDF
- Date
- 2020-05-12 21:28
- Type
- chat message · slack
- recipient
- Robert F. Garry, Edward C. Holmes, Andrew Rambaut
- speaker
- Kristian G. Andersen
Recipients on this medium are inferred from channel membership, not per-message addressing.
The three main new things that bothers me - the first two shown in this post
http://virological.org/t/identification-of-a-common-deletion-in-the-spike-protein-of-sars-cov-2/451:
1. The furin site is clearly active in tissue culture. We see the virus lose it under some culturing conditions, but this effect could be very cell-type specific. What bothers me here is that the virus is clearly fiddling with this site inculture. If it can lose it, likely it can gain it? Typically SARS-like CoVs are cultured in the presence of trypsin (to allow for cleavage of S1/S2), but if trypsin isn't added, there's a *huge* selection pressure for gaining a furin site. SARS-CoV-2 can grow without trypsin - other SARS-like CoVs can't.2. The example from bovine CoVs (post #6 on the thread on virological) is exactly a 12bp insertion seen in tissue culture creating a furin cleavage site.3. We have now seen multiple examples of SARS-CoV-2 de novo obtaining exactly 12bp insertions in different partsof the spike, but only in tissue culture. They're not furin sites, but there seems to be some affinity specifically for12bp insertions (in T/C) - and of course, the furin cleavage site is exactly 12bp. There could be some specific mechanism behind this. We're looking into this a little closer at the moment.
Links shared
- preprint http://virological.org/t/identification-of-a-common-deletion-in-the-spike-protein-of-sars-cov-2/451