Attachment
Reading Room Production, p.71 · reading_room:exh:00016
Page text: p.71 · original PDF
- Date
- — (unknown precision)
- Type
- attachment · document
South Sea map on the figure
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM aaa own..iov.cn> wrote:
Hi both!
I think the map format that Hong Ying provided is even better. Thanks!
AAEX:"Hongying Li" <i@ecohealthalliance.org>
AGATA] :2020-03-28 23:03:46 (HA7\)
Wee A: "ARE"
wh.iov.cn>
PH: "Alice Latinne"
ecohealthalliance.org>
=F gi: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript
Hi Both!
I think either the South China Sea label can be smaller so it can fit into Figure 6 in two maps; Or
the attached format of the South China Sea can be considered, which will fit better into Figure 6
I
guess, but requires some more editing. But I defer to whatever you decide.
Hongying
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 9:16 AM aA Bown. iov.cn> wrote:
Yes I would like to suggest that it appears twice in both figure A and B. But it seems that
the space is limited and the layout need to be adjusted?
What do you think, Hongying?
AEX "Alice Latinne"
ecohealthalliance.org>
AKA
[A] :2020-03-28 17:30:57 (EHAZX)
Wee: "Hage" own iov.cn>
P>iX: "Hongying Li" {§fPecohealthalliance.org>, "/§#-FGIERK" own. iov.cn>, "Peter
Daszak"
ecohealthalliance.org>
=F: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript
Hi Ben,
Is the new Figure 6 ok? Or do I have to put the South China Sea 2 times?
Thanks,
Alice
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:32 PM dha own iov.cn> wrote:
Thanks a lot Alice. The maps now seems perfect.
Please note that the two maps in Figure 6 also need to be modified (that could be easier I
think, as only South China Sea need to be added)
Best wishes
Ben