COVID-19 Records

Attachment

Reading Room Production, p.71 · reading_room:exh:00016

Page text: p.71 · original PDF

Date
(unknown precision)
Type
attachment · document
Topics
EcoHealth Alliance funding and grantsChina relations and data access
South Sea map on the figure On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM aaa own..iov.cn> wrote: Hi both! I think the map format that Hong Ying provided is even better. Thanks! AAEX:"Hongying Li" <i@ecohealthalliance.org> AGATA] :2020-03-28 23:03:46 (HA7\) Wee A: "ARE" wh.iov.cn> PH: "Alice Latinne" ecohealthalliance.org> =F gi: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript Hi Both! I think either the South China Sea label can be smaller so it can fit into Figure 6 in two maps; Or the attached format of the South China Sea can be considered, which will fit better into Figure 6 I guess, but requires some more editing. But I defer to whatever you decide. Hongying On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 9:16 AM aA Bown. iov.cn> wrote: Yes I would like to suggest that it appears twice in both figure A and B. But it seems that the space is limited and the layout need to be adjusted? What do you think, Hongying? AEX "Alice Latinne" ecohealthalliance.org> AKA [A] :2020-03-28 17:30:57 (EHAZX) Wee: "Hage" own iov.cn> P>iX: "Hongying Li" {§fPecohealthalliance.org>, "/§#-FGIERK" own. iov.cn>, "Peter Daszak" ecohealthalliance.org> =F: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript Hi Ben, Is the new Figure 6 ok? Or do I have to put the South China Sea 2 times? Thanks, Alice On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:32 PM dha own iov.cn> wrote: Thanks a lot Alice. The maps now seems perfect. Please note that the two maps in Figure 6 also need to be modified (that could be easier I think, as only South China Sea need to be added) Best wishes Ben