Reading Room Production — page 71

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 11:55 AM Alice Latinne <li @ecohealthalliance.org> wrote: Hi all, I think using the new map from Hongying is too much work but I'll try. If not, I'll put two small China South Sea map on the figure On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 8:00 AM aaa own..iov.cn> wrote: Hi both! I think the map format that Hong Ying provided is even better. Thanks! AAEX:"Hongying Li" <i@ecohealthalliance.org> AGATA] :2020-03-28 23:03:46 (HA7\) Wee A: "ARE" wh.iov.cn> PH: "Alice Latinne" ecohealthalliance.org> =F gi: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript Hi Both! I think either the South China Sea label can be smaller so it can fit into Figure 6 in two maps; Or the attached format of the South China Sea can be considered, which will fit better into Figure 6 I guess, but requires some more editing. But I defer to whatever you decide. Hongying On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 9:16 AM aA Bown. iov.cn> wrote: Yes I would like to suggest that it appears twice in both figure A and B. But it seems that the space is limited and the layout need to be adjusted? What do you think, Hongying? AEX "Alice Latinne" ecohealthalliance.org> AKA [A] :2020-03-28 17:30:57 (EHAZX) Wee: "Hage" own iov.cn> P>iX: "Hongying Li" {§fPecohealthalliance.org>, "/§#-FGIERK" own. iov.cn>, "Peter Daszak" ecohealthalliance.org> =F: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript Hi Ben, Is the new Figure 6 ok? Or do I have to put the South China Sea 2 times? Thanks, Alice On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 3:32 PM dha own iov.cn> wrote: Thanks a lot Alice. The maps now seems perfect. Please note that the two maps in Figure 6 also need to be modified (that could be easier I think, as only South China Sea need to be added) Best wishes Ben