Reading Room Production, pp.281-283 · reading_room:email:00296
Page text: p.281, p.282, p.283 · original PDF
- Date
- — (unknown precision)
- Type
- email · email
ecohealthalliance.org>
CC: Hongying Li
ecohealthalliance.org>; 41EAS low iov.cn>; Peter Daszak <E @ ccohealthalliance.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript
Oh I see. It is named 4991 when submitted earlier as a partial sequence. We renamed it as RaTG13 when we publish as a
full-length sequence.
So it would be OK. Only the deletion of "we" in the sentence will be enough.
Best
AE X::"Alice Latinne"
ecohealthalliance.org>
ACEI [A):2020-04-05 18:01:25 (2HIA)
WEA: "AAR"
wh.iov.cn>
1%: "Hongying Li"
ecohealthalliance.org>, "4Q1EAN" Blows iov.cn>, "Peter Daszak"
ecohealthalliance.org>
=F gil: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript
Hi Ben,
1) RaTG13 is not included in the Figure 3. The closest sequence is a sequence from GenBank (KP876546) and published
in 2016 in a paper from your lab:
Ge X-Y, Wang N, Zhang W, Hu B, Li B, Zhang Y-Z, Zhou J-H, Luo C-M, Yang X-L, Wu L-J, et al. (Ge2016 co-authors).
2016. Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft. Virologica Sinica 31:3140.
This sequence is 100% identical to RaTG13, is it the same sample?
I'll delete the word "we" in the sentence.
2) I'll check and correct this as needed.
Cheers,
Alice