Fauci Intelligence Community Release, pp.70-72 · fauci_intel:email:00051
Page text: p.70, p.71, p.72 · original PDF
- Date
- — (unknown precision)
- Type
- email · email
Subj: SARS-CoV-2 ORIGINS INVESTIGATION WITH US GOVERNMENT PROGRAM
UNDISCLOSED DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
Ref:(1) Executive Slide HR00118Soo17 EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE
(2) HR00118S0017-PREEMPT-FP-019-PM Summary (Selectable - Not
Recommended)
(3) PREEMPT Volume 1 no ESS HR00118S0017 EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE
(4) PREEMPT Volume 2 EHA Final HR00118S0017 EcoHealth Alliance
DEFUSE
(5) SF424_2_0-V2.0 HR00118S0017 EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE
(6) WIV Budget packet HR001118S0017 EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE
(7) WS00094394-RR_KeyPersonExpanded_2_0-V2.0 HR001118S0017
EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE
(8) WS00094394-RR_PersonalData_1_2-V1.2 HR001118S0017 EcoHealth
Alliance DEFUSE
1. SARS-CoV-2 is an American-created recombinant bat vaccine, or its
precursor virus. It was created by an EcoHealth Alliance program at the
Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), as suggested by the reporting
surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have
been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in
the EcoHealth Alliance proposal response to the DARPAi PREEMPTii program
Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2018iii - a
document not yet publicly disclosed.
The contents of the proposed program are extremely detailed. Peter Daszak
lays out step-by-step what the organization intends to do by phase and
by location. The primary scientists involved, their roles, and their
institutions are indicated. The funding plan for the WIV work is its own
document. The reasons why nonpharmaceutical interventions like masks and
medical countermeasures like the mRNA vaccines do not work well can be
extrapolated from the details. The reasons why the early treatment
protocols work as curatives are apparent.
SARS-CoV-2's form as it emerged is likely as a precursor, deliberately
virulent, humanized recombinant SARSr-CoV that was to be reverse
engineered into a live attenuated SARSr-Cov bat vaccine. Its nature can
be determined from analysis of its genome with the context provided by
the EcoHealth Alliance proposal. Joining this analysis with US
intelligence collections on Wuhan will aid this determination.
DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY
675 NORTH RANDOLPH STREET
ARLINGTON, VA 22203-2114
For SHSGAC Use Only - SHSGAC_COVID_119th 011832
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
When synthesized with the EcoHealth Alliance proposal, US collections
confirm EcoHealth Alliance was performing the work proposed. The analysts
produce their reports in a vacuum, absent the context the proposal
provides. As a fellow at DARPA, I could see both, and can do the
synthesis. For instance, WIV personnel identified in intelligence
reports are named in the proposal, these people use the lexicon of the
proposal in the collections, and the virus variants proposed for
experimentation are identical to those gleaned by collections. Moreover,
I am also privy to information obtained by congressional office
investigators and by DRASTICiv, which further corroborates that the
program detailed in the BAA response was conducted until it was shut
down in April 2020.
The purpose of the EcoHealth program, called DEFUSEv in the proposal,
was to inoculate bats in the Yunnan, China caves where confirmed SARSCoVs were found. Ostensibly, doing this would prevent another SARS-CoV
pandemic; the bats' immune systems would be reinforced to prevent a
deadly SARS-CoV from emerging. The specific language used is "inoculate
bats with novel chimeric polyvalent spike proteins to enhance their
adaptive immune memory against specific high-risk viruses." vi Being
defense-related, it makes sense that EcoHealth submitted the proposal
first to the Department of Defense, before it settled with NIH/NIAID.
The BAA response is dated March 2018 and was submitted by Peter Daszak,
president of EcoHealth Alliance.
DARPA rejected the proposal because the work was too close to violating
the gain-of-function (GoF) moratorium,vii despite what Peter Daszak says
in the proposal (that the work would notviii). As is known, Dr. Fauci with
NIAID did not reject the proposal. The work took place at the WIV and
at several sites in the US, identified in detail in the proposal.ix
The EcoHealth Alliance response to the PREEMPT BAA is placed along with
other proposal documents in the PREEMPT folder on the DARPA Biological
Technologies
Office
JWICS
(top
secret)
share
drive,
address:
Network/filer/BTO/CI Folder/PREEMPT
This folder was empty for a year. The files, completely unmarked with
classification or distribution data, were placed in this folder in July
2021, which conspicuously aligns with media reporting, my probing, and
Senator Paul's inquiry into NIH/NIAID gain-of-function programs. The
unmarked nature combined with the timing signals that the documents were
being hidden. No files at DARPA go unmarked in classification or
distribution, including proprietary documents. Furthermore, PREEMPT is
an unclassified program.
The files are also now held by Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA).
They are identified in the reference block above.
2. SARS-CoV-2, hereafter referred to as SARSr-CoV-WIV, is a synthetic
spike protein chimera engineered to attach to human ACE2 receptors and
For SHSGAC Use Only - SHSGAC_COVID_119th 011833
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
inserted into a recombinant bat SARSr-CoV backbone. It is likely a live
vaccine not yet engineered to a more attenuated state that the program
sought to create with its final version. It leaked and spread rapidly
because it was aerosolized so it could efficiently infect bats in caves,
but it was not ready to infect bats yet, which is why it does not appear
to infect bats. The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is
less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride
on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live
attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattentuating
since initial escape in August 2019.