COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.100 · baric_ti:utt:00867

Page text: p.100 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Christina Salazar, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Ralph S. Baric
Topics
Gain-of-function researchWuhan Institute of Virology collaboration
I'm going to get to that. So if you go back to the NSABB P3CO regulations, the regulations state that viruses, like flu, SARS, and MERS coronavirus, are highly pathogenic viruses, and highly transmissible viruses are covered by this program. And if you do anything on these particular viruses that are highly pathogenic or highly transmissible, and you do any manipulation to increase that, then that's considered gain-of-function and regulated by those documents, based on my read of them. There are exemptions to that gain-of-function regulation framework. The first is that if you work with zoonotic viruses, like WIV1, which has never been show to infect a human being, that has never shown to be transmissible in humans, it is not subject to the gain-of18 function regulatory framework. It has to be reviewed, but the review process would require that it be -- the review process would, based on the regulations, say it's not subject to those gain --

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
So if you go back to the NSABB P3CO regulations, the regulations state that viruses, like flu, SARS, and MERS coronavirus, are highly pathogenic viruses, and highly transmissible viruses are covered by this program. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts
And if you do anything on these particular viruses that are highly pathogenic or highly transmissible, and you do any manipulation to increase that, then that's considered gain-of-function and regulated by those documents, based on my read of them. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts
There are exemptions to that gain-of-function regulation framework. needs context speaker_own asserts
The first is that if you work with zoonotic viruses, like WIV1, which has never been show to infect a human being, that has never shown to be transmissible in humans, it is not subject to the gain-of18 function regulatory framework. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I think you're making an incorrect intuitive leap. I was trying to describe the two approaches that were being used to control viruses in a cave setting. The other approach was that having identified strains of viruses that had spike genes that could infect human cells and potentially cause human disease, those spike genes would be isolated and placed in virus vaccine vectors that would then be delivered to the bats in the cave, is the second approach. The first approach is immediate innate immune knockdown so that the virus burden in the cave goes down and it's less likely that a soldier will be infected. The second approach is to immunize the bats in that cave so that a virus burden would be very, very low, and it would be long-term protection so the cave could be used for a much longer period of time. So they are linked but they're different approaches to abrogate virus replication.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Okay. Would this have been subject to the gain-of-function pause in 2017? DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    So the short answer is no, up to a point, okay.
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    What's the point?
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric
    I'm going to get to that. So if you go back to the NSABB P3CO regulations, the regulations state that viruses, like flu, SARS, and MERS coronavirus, are highly pathogenic viruses, and highly transmissible viruses are covered by this program. And if you do anything on these particular viruses that are highly pathogenic or highly transmissible, and you do any manipulation to increase that, then that's considered gain-of-function and regulated by those documents, based on my read of them. There are exemptions to that gain-of-function regulation framework. The first is that if you work with zoonotic viruses, like WIV1, which has never been show to infect a human being, that has never shown to be transmissible in humans, it is not subject to the gain-of18 function regulatory framework. It has to be reviewed, but the review process would require that it be -- the review process would, based on the regulations, say it's not subject to those gain --
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    But how do you know what you don't know?
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Secondly, if you're doing work that's related to the development of vaccines or serology, it's also except from the gain-of-function policy. DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Or national security. That was also an exemption.
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I don't know what you mean by that.

Full conversation →