A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
I don't know. The authors were from Chinese groups. We could find the paper, but that was the first report. In fact, the whole genesis around the pangolin strains, these pangolin strains, is confusing because the group that published first had one sequence. And then, if I understand it correctly, those sequences and samples were picked up, I believe, by WIV researchers, or another group, and they published a completely different set of sequences. So one paper is in a very infrequently read journal, and then the other was in Nature.
-
What's the other journal?
-
Again, I can't remember. So there's an DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com issue about -- it's not clear why they found two different virus sequences in the same samples.
-
Okay.
-
2026-04-10 09:00
Ralph S. Baric
I did actually make a molecular clone of a pangolin GD strain, and we published it --
-
Can I have the document back? I think we showed you the part that is relevant to our discussion. You look too interested over there. [Laughter.]
-
Are we peeking?
-
Yep, go ahead.
-
Just a clarification. On this email that you just reviewed, did you write this?