COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), pp.57-58 · baric_ti:utt:00457

Page text: p.57, p.58 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Christina Salazar, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Ralph S. Baric
Yeah. The purpose of the call was to talk about origins and potential origins. Most of the discussion was led by the evolutionary biologists, who were actually probably the most key, important people in the room. And what they said was that they thought it was DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com extremely unlikely that there was any evidence of genetic engineering of the virus, but that they had trouble distinguishing between natural evolutionary processes in cell culture versus animals. And that became sort of the consensus, that it evolved by natural evolutionary processes.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I don't recall.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    You're not on any of the invitation lists, and it's a question. And you don't recall?
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I don't recall. I actually looked at all my records and I can't find the reason why I was on the call.
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Do you recall what was discussed on the call?
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric
    Yeah. The purpose of the call was to talk about origins and potential origins. Most of the discussion was led by the evolutionary biologists, who were actually probably the most key, important people in the room. And what they said was that they thought it was DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com extremely unlikely that there was any evidence of genetic engineering of the virus, but that they had trouble distinguishing between natural evolutionary processes in cell culture versus animals. And that became sort of the consensus, that it evolved by natural evolutionary processes.
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    And then what else did they discuss. Natural origin, that it evolved naturally?
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Well, that's natural origin process that either occurs through nature or natural evolutionary processes that might occur in cell cultures. They're really hard to tell apart.
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    I'm not a scientist, so natural origin, to me genetically engineered or accidental release? And correct me.
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    So accidental release would have fallen under the category of natural evolutionary processes in cell culture.

Full conversation →