COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.26 · baric_ti:utt:00144

Page text: p.26 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Ralph S. Baric, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Christina Salazar
Okay. So that meeting was the 13th or 14th?

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    I'm not a scientist. But I am familiar with it. So let's turn to that paper. So that was a topic of, and I'm sure you've read the FOIAs about you since, a topic of great discussion. Early in 2020, February 2020, it seemed like all of a sudden that paper was sent around among several people. I think Fauci sent it out on February 1st to a number of people within the NIH.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I wouldn't know when he did that, but I DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com believe you.
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Were you ever asked about that paper by anyone?
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Yes. On the 13th of February, I believe, 13th or 14th -- again, exact day is going to be difficult for me to recollect without notes in front of me -- but on the 13th or 14th I was up in D.C. for a progress report meeting on a grant and also giving a talk at some meeting. So we scheduled a meeting for about an hour with his leadership team, and I met him either at his office or at one of the NIH buildings for the extramural program.
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar
    Okay. So that meeting was the 13th or 14th?
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    13th or 14th, yes.
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    It's not the 11th?
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    It might be the 11th. I don't think it's the 11th.
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Yeah. That's another topic that we wanted to discuss, because I think there's been some confusion just in our documents of when the meeting actually occurred. I think it's been on some calendars for the 11th.

Full conversation →