COVID-19 Records

Peter Marks

Engagement

Authored2
Substantive (25+ words)2
Threads posted in2
Distinct active days2
Words authored316
Received (incl. group broadcast)1

Received counts include every message sent to a channel this person belonged to. That measures presence, not participation.

Statements

  • 0 own voice
  • 1 need context
  • 3 quoted / not their view

4 sentences were extracted and attributed to this person. Most are not their own opinion. Reporting the total as “4 statements” would misrepresent them.

Correspondents

PersonMediumMsgsSpan
Anthony S. Fauci email 2 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Julia Tierney email 2 2021-09-20 – 2022-07-29
Sherri Berger email 2 2021-09-20 – 2022-07-29
Amanda Cohn email 1 2021-09-20 – 2021-09-20
Barbara Mahon email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
David Kessler email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Dawn O Connell email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Hilary Marston email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Jason Roos email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Lawrence A. Tabak email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Leslie Dach email 1 2021-09-20 – 2021-09-20
Michael Varrone email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Rachel Levine email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Robert Califf email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Robert Goldstein email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29
Rochelle Walensky email 1 2021-09-20 – 2021-09-20
Sarah Walinsky email 1 2021-09-20 – 2021-09-20
Vivek Murthy email 1 2022-07-29 – 2022-07-29

Topics

Appears in

Statement record

Showing: own voice, substantive needs context quoted / not their view all

2021-09-20 quoted / not their view quoted_external · asserts · email
Dear Rochelle, Amanda, and Sherry, By report, it would appear that ACIP WG and others at FDA and CDC are not happy with giving boosters to healthcare workers and others less than age 65 at risk of occupational or institutional exposure.

Tony's Diary Package, p.879 · original PDF · in context

2021-09-20 quoted / not their view quoted_external · asserts · email
Though we have not yet finalized the language, here is where we are heading at the moment: A Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine booster dose administered at least 6 months after completion of the primary series is authorized for use in: • individuals 65 years of age and older, and • individuals 18 through 64 years of age at high risk of severe COVID-19 Will continue to keep you posted here.

Tony's Diary Package, p.879 · original PDF · in context

2022-07-29 needs context uncertain · asserts · email
Perhaps the 4/8/12 messaging is going to be the best way to go then At least 4 weeks if you are over fifty until next booster (I know the immunologist don't love this, but there are different antigens in the booster and mRNA vaccines are not the same as protein based vaccines.

Tony's Diary Package, p.998 · original PDF · in context

2022-07-29 quoted / not their view quoted_external · asserts · email
This seems to balance the potential benefits and risks) At least 8 weeks if your are under fifty At least 12 weeks if you recently had COVID If you are immunocompromised, you will need to wait at least 4 weeks, but follow your healthcare providers recommendation nrence.tabak@nih.gov ifauci@niaid.nih.gov>; urthy@hhs.gov Istein, Robert H (CDC) »1r.Marks@fda.hhs.gov>; Booster Tabak <lawrence.tabak@nih.gov>, Tony Fauci <afauci@niaid.nih.gov>, Rachel ek.Murthy@hhs.gov>, David Kessler Michael.Varrone@hhs.gov ')" <bdm3@cdc.gov>, "Goldstein, Robert H Best Regards, Peter

Tony's Diary Package, p.998 · original PDF · in context