Slack / Private Message Drop — page 889
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001103
← p.888 p.890 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[2021-05-28 07:38:43]
[Kristian Andersen]
Just pure insanity all around. And the main issue here is the false equivalence - there's this sense that unless we
have 100% proof, we can't know one way or the other. Simply not true - given current evidence, we can give a very
strong statement about how this happened - unless somebody brings credible data about a lab leak, we already
know what happened and just need to figure out the exact details.
[2021-05-28 07:44:27]
[Robert Garry]
Yes it's a binary [but an incredibly skewed one] - it's either lab leak [all versions by the way involve conspiracies now
- because even if you accept Relman's "they had it and didn't know hybrid scenario" then they still have to be lying
about the serology] *or* natural. Disprove one and it has to be the other.
[2021-05-28 07:53:44]
[Robert Garry]
Serious question - now that _Science_ stuck their collective head in the sand do I send anything back to the
Bloomshitters. I was thinking about a "cordial," - It does not look like Science has any interest in hosting any type of
serious discussion about COVID-19 origins. There will be other opportunities. Meanwhile, please take another look
at the data in the WHO document. There is actually a lot of evidence here including important genetic data regarding
the cases at the markets. Or, just let it "lie."
[2021-05-28 08:19:50]
[Robert Garry]
@Eddie Holmes thinking more about you brilliant idea - they definitely need to test those environmental samples
and identify the animals associated withe the SC2 PCR positives at the marketS. Veterinary genetics forensics is
definitely a thing. https://vgl.ucdavis.edu/forensics
[2021-05-28 08:20:18]
[Robert Garry]
BTW - doing TwiV at 1pm...
[2021-05-28 12:56:07]
[Robert Garry]
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bies.202100015
[2021-05-28 12:57:34]
[Robert Garry]
Another Dynamic Duo: Rosanna and Yurie claiming the sequences must be fake.
[2021-05-28 12:58:51]
[Kristian Andersen]
NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY BOB, NOT A CONSPIRACY!!!!
I'm just asking questions...
[2021-05-28 13:15:10]
[Kristian Andersen]
A little shaky, but some helpful comments from Relman and Baric on their true beliefs.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/the-sudden-rise-of-the-coronavirus-lab-leak-theory
[2021-05-28 13:15:28]
[Kristian Andersen]
Here's Relman with his main argument... I'll let you be the judge. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-28 at 1.14.15
PM.png]
[2021-05-28 13:57:29]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/889
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:09212 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09213 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09214 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09215 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09216 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09217 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09218 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09219 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09220 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09221 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889 |
| slack_pm:msg:09222 | 2021-05-28 | chat message | 889–890 |