Slack / Private Message Drop — page 864
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001078
← p.863 p.865 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[2021-05-24 19:05:42]
[Eddie Holmes]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/05/24/right-is-dwelling-slanderous-myths-about-origins-covid-19/
[2021-05-24 19:06:16]
[Kristian Andersen]
[thread - ID: 2021-05-24 19:06:16]
Yeah, it's pretty good - links to our paper as well.
[2021-05-24 19:06:57]
[Kristian Andersen]
I'm currently reading this: https://www.vice.com/en/article/wx5ndx/china-coronavirus-origins-who-mission
Very insightful so far (on the political aspects - which, I should say, we pretty much have nailed down as well, unlike
many others....)
[2021-05-24 19:14:32]
[Eddie Holmes]
This is really getting out of hand.
[2021-05-24 19:17:51]
[Kristian Andersen]
It'll get worse, I'm sure - it's currently not about science, but about a power struggle between two super powers.
Better to just focus on the science...
[2021-05-24 19:18:27]
[Kristian Andersen]
While I don't agree with everything, that Vice article is good - I strongly suggest reading it to get some of the
background on the politics involved. Very insightful.
[2021-05-24 19:23:37]
[Eddie Holmes]
I can testify that between Jan 5-12 the issues were (i) controlling the message because the word 'SARS' was
involved and (ii) the egos battling in China for who would get the credit for identifying the virus. On the letter -
between us, the only reason Zhang told the Ministry of Health on the 5th was because I bloody well told him to.
Twice:
[2021-05-24 19:23:46]
[Eddie Holmes]
shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-05-21 at 12.03.40 pm.png
[2021-05-24 19:24:42]
[Eddie Holmes]
None of this was about a possible lab leak. And all shit that hit the fan afterwards...none of that was about a possible
lab leak either.
[2021-05-24 19:27:39]
[Kristian Andersen]
I don't understand why people don't understand that - it's really rather simple if you have a little bit of insight into
outbreak response. But maybe people either have (a) no experience whatsoever in outbreak response, or (b) they
don't _want_ to understand.
Very insightful from you btw - early January... I mean, we knew nothing at the time. "The latter is obviously very bad"
will haunt you forever... :wink:.
Will these emails be public at some point?
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/864
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:08983 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08984 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08985 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08986 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08987 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08988 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08989 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08990 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08991 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |
| slack_pm:msg:08992 | 2021-05-24 | chat message | 864 |