Slack / Private Message Drop — page 69
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000283
← p.68 p.70 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Kristian Andersen]
While I knew about the furin site insertion experiments, I did know realize this (that the insertion in SARS2 is exactly
where they inserted it experimentally in SARS):
https://twitter.com/Ayjchan/status/1266805310313967617?s=20
[2020-06-11 13:35:58]
[Kristian Andersen]
Gotta say - some smoking(ish) guns starting to appear that I'm not comfortable with and Alina here is touching on a
lot of points we have discussed previously that were concerning (e.g., lack of selection - I should have looked into
that a little closer earlier :wink: ). The furin site in SARS2 is exactly the same as it is in some of the HKU1
sequences.
When I talked to Farzan way back in the day he mentioned that the one thing he'd be looking for was whether
SARS2 would lose the furin site under different conditions - we now know this to be true (primarily in T/C, but there
are examples in people too - intrahost).
[2020-06-11 13:58:46]
[Robert Garry]
"exactly where they inserted it experimentally in SARS" Sure - but that site with the single R is a required cleavage
site - if you're going to convert to a furin site then adding RRA at that exact position is the only thing that makes
sense - or even RRAR to make it a super-optimal site like Nunberg did - what would not make sense is to stick a
proline in and then to do the whole insertion out-of-frame.
[2020-06-11 14:08:35]
[Kristian Andersen]
Yeah, agreed - however, this exact site already exist in other CoVs (just not in exactly this site) - not in HKU1 as I
said, but in that Feline CoV.
The part I'm really struggling with is that at the end of the day, we really don't have any hard evidence one way or
the other - and especially given some of the recent evidence, we also can't rule out that somebody actually put it in
there. That's obviously not to say that somebody _*did*_, but we can't rule it out. Our paper was pretty strong in
saying "there's no way", but I have less confidence in that statement at this stage.
[2020-06-11 14:33:23]
[Eddie Holmes]
What smoking guns Kristian? I don't quite see it. What recent evidence are you talking about? That Follis paper was
literally the first one I looked at. Doesn't it's presence in HKU1 suggest that these events in nature a lot? Do we know
what animal HKU1 comes from? I was reading Mike's paper to suggest that D614G was under selection to increase
the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, because it was directly related to the furin cleavage insertion, such that it not perfectly
adapted to humans on emergence.
[2020-06-11 14:33:34]
[Eddie Holmes]
What about Bill Gallaher's evidence?
[2020-06-11 14:34:14]
[Robert Garry]
HKU1 actually does have an optimal furin site - some strains have a insert or deletion of SSS - yes some of these S
have predicted O-glycans [shared file(s): HKU-1 Spike.pdf]
[2020-06-11 14:38:27]
[Robert Garry]
"animal HKU1 comes from" Rodents maybe - probably
[2020-06-11 14:44:30]
[Eddie Holmes]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/69
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:00698 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 68–69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00699 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00700 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00701 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00702 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00703 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00704 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00705 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69 |
| slack_pm:msg:00706 | 2020-06-11 | chat message | 69–70 |