Slack / Private Message Drop — page 679
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000893
← p.678 p.680 → · this page in the original PDF · package
Actually I should bring this name up with Frank:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuba_peoples
[2021-04-05 15:31:34]
[Eddie Holmes]
I think you should. Ridicule is minutes away.
[2021-04-05 15:41:48]
[Robert Garry]
I'm sure that the millions on twitter will have a field day. Not a good look for WHO.
[2021-04-05 15:48:44]
[Eddie Holmes]
I'm emailing Frank now
[2021-04-05 18:11:34]
[Eddie Holmes]
This one is interesting. I might be allowed back into China for a while: https://www.smh.com.au/national/australia-pa
id-a-high-price-for-unsatisfying-report-into-global-tragedy-20210405-p57gke.html
[2021-04-05 19:18:41]
[Robert Garry]
Brilliant Eddie - Well done!
[2021-04-05 19:41:00]
[Eddie Holmes]
He did a good job. Of course, I meant to say that I might NOT be allowed back into China...
[2021-04-05 20:02:00]
[Eddie Holmes]
Got this from another journo....very interesting:
[2021-04-05 20:02:02]
[Eddie Holmes]
I've been following the wildlife farms part of this from the start [and before that on other stories]. It does not appear
there was much of an effort to check captive bred wildlife facilities. 31 farms in Hubei, with about 3,000 animals,
were checked. 27,000 sample from "wildlife" across China, but a large part of that appears to be zoo animals if you
check the annexes. There's one prefecture with about four counties in it in Western Hubei that had 290 farms and
450,000 animals alone at the start of the outbreak. Why would Chinese authorities not check more farms but
prepared to shut down so many of them [on the raising for meat consumption side]? Anyone here you think would be
able to address that?
I'm also confused by the WHO report from November which said their were live wild mammals present at the market
prior to Dec. 31, 2019 and the latest study team report which takes the market authority and one Huanan manager's
word for it that there were no live wild mammals at the market at that time.
The people who owned Huanan market owned a much larger market in Huangpi, offering similar products. I've not
been given a satisfactory answer why this market wasn't investigated.
The owner of the Huanan market and this other market himself is quite problematic from a potential wildlife
trafficking perspective, but I can't say much about what I know there at the moment. Just curious if you'd heard
anything at all about the ultimate owner [his daughter runs the market, but he owns it]. They were there when the
WHO team was there at Huanan, but apparently no one talked to them.
Got to get my kids to school. Happy to talk more if you are open to it.
Best,
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/679
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:07117 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 678–679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07118 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07119 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07120 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07121 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07122 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07123 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07124 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679 |
| slack_pm:msg:07125 | 2021-04-05 | chat message | 679–680 |