Slack / Private Message Drop — page 534
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000748
← p.533 p.535 → · this page in the original PDF · package
Fig 2 [shared file(s): CoV Mosaic v3 minus HA379-363 copy.pdf]
[2021-02-20 15:42:30]
[Robert Garry]
Fig 1
[2021-02-20 15:44:34]
[Robert Garry]
Fig 1 [shared file(s): new asian bat covs 2-6-21a copy.pdf]
[2021-02-20 15:53:22]
[Kristian Andersen]
These are great figures. Isn't it funny that the indel with the really important site is somehow super mysterious to the
tinfoil hats, while the many other indels aren't? :thinking_face:
[2021-02-20 16:06:08]
[Kristian Andersen]
Looks great Bob - ready to post from my standpoint.
[2021-02-20 16:10:47]
[Eddie Holmes]
Bob - can I have one more look over it today? Then post tomorrow?
[2021-02-20 16:13:52]
[Eddie Holmes]
I think the WIV is totally off the agenda for the WHO. My contacts say that the Chinese have been not looking into
either. Let's face it, identifying a lab weak from WIV is a Yale lock with a credit card for the security services and yet
they have fuck all.
[2021-02-20 16:52:18]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Sorry to keep doing this to you Bob but have you any thoughts on A701V ? Close enough to FCS to have an effect?
[2021-02-20 16:52:33]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Or just a nothing.
[2021-02-20 17:24:05]
[Robert Garry]
No problem at all - please keep the questions coming. I think the A701V could just be random. A to V a pretty
conservative change, but A82V in Ebola virus was a pretty big deal. It's in the region between S1/S2 and S2' so it
gets "cut out" during entry - some thoughts that the cutout peptide could have some "activity." Maybe, but it could
just be a "spacer," Not close enough to the FCS to have an effect.
[2021-02-20 18:44:02]
[Eddie Holmes]
[thread - ID: 2021-02-20 18:44:02]
Paper looks good to post Bob. There are just 2 comments left which I think are resolved but you can judge. Do we
need an Abstract? Perhaps not for a post?
[2021-02-21 05:23:15]
[Robert Garry]
Thanks all! It does look great and good strong counterpoints to the lab origins mob (hey look at the science). Will
make the final edits when I get to the office a bit later this morning. One final minor point- will add the Alina ref, per
Kristian, but then should also add Petrovsky I think ???
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/534
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:05554 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 533–534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05555 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05556 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05557 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05558 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05559 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05560 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05561 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05562 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05563 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05564 | 2021-02-20 | chat message | 534 |
| slack_pm:msg:05565 | 2021-02-21 | chat message | 534 |