Slack / Private Message Drop — page 249
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000463
← p.248 p.250 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[2020-11-02 13:07:35]
[Eddie Holmes]
Interesting article indeed. Not a good look for the WHO nor George Gao really. Hilarious that Ian is so desperate to
get into the action yet is so peripheral. Most of all, it is amazing that we really no nothing concrete about those
market samples. Not a good look.
[2020-11-02 13:54:03]
[Andrew Rambaut]
[thread - ID: 2020-11-02 11:36:51]
@Eddie Holmes The tinfoil brigade are going to love this!
[2020-11-02 14:57:26]
[Eddie Holmes]
[thread - ID: 2020-11-02 11:36:51]
@Eddie Holmes Indeed, but it's the best outcome. Hopefully EBI can confirm if necessary.
[2020-11-02 15:29:16]
[Eddie Holmes]
[thread - ID: 2020-11-02 11:36:51]
@Eddie Holmes And let's face, the tinfoil hat brigade would moan whatever the solution.
[2020-11-04 09:15:26]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Where's a Dane when you need him to translate something:
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/indland/statens-serum-institut-mink-med-muteret-virus-kan-oedelaegge-effekten-af-vacci
ne#!/
[2020-11-04 09:15:51]
[Andrew Rambaut]
> Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen announce that all mink at all mink farms in Denmark must be killed.
Coronavirus have mutated in mink and that could ruin the effect of a future Covid19 vaccine.
[2020-11-04 09:16:03]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Sounds like bollocks to me.
[2020-11-04 12:44:53]
[Eddie Holmes]
Yup, sounds like another rash use of the word 'mutation'.
[2020-11-04 14:29:13]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Actually, I have some inside information from WHO (please keep confidential):
> We have tested a variant with four simultaneous changes in the spike protein (Amino acid changes: 69del,
Y453F, I692V, M1229I). This variant has been found in five minkfarms and also in humans in the surrounding
community. A complete GISAID upload of all Danish Sars-CoV-2 sequences of human origin is planned for the end
of week 45. We have cultured this virus from a human patient and evaluated whether it was sensitive to neutralizing
antibodies (antisera) from a collection of sera from convalescent COVID-19 patients. We found that this virus
showed less sensitivity (resistance) for neutralizing antibodies from persons with previous COVID-19 infection.
[2020-11-04 14:29:35]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Why they are not releasing this information and the data I don't know.
[2020-11-04 14:53:52]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/249
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:02588 | 2020-11-02 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02589 | 2020-11-02 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02590 | 2020-11-02 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02591 | 2020-11-02 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02592 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02593 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02594 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02595 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02596 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02597 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249 |
| slack_pm:msg:02598 | 2020-11-04 | chat message | 249–250 |