Slack / Private Message Drop — page 1000
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001214
← p.999 p.1001 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Andrew Rambaut]
Would you pick CGG for example? Would you consider what codon to use for an R or just pick one arbitrarily.
[2021-09-21 08:21:23]
[Kristian Andersen]
CGG would be an unusual choice IMO - not a 'optimized' R and sorta middle-of-the-pack as it comes to usage in
human genomes. Very rare, of course, in viruses because it's a CpG.
[2021-09-21 08:24:03]
[Andrew Rambaut]
And you have 6 codons to chose from.
[2021-09-21 08:25:24]
[Kristian Andersen]
Correct. Key here too is that if you were to 'optimize' the FCS sequence (as is commonly done for these types of
experiments) you would _not_ end up with the FCS sequence we see, including the CGG codons. But again, it
doesn't really tell us much.
[2021-09-21 08:26:15]
[Kristian Andersen]
What I think we have to look _very_ closely at are all the specific sites they talk about in the grant and then compare
across our alignments - is SC2 unique in those positions compared to, say, the BANAL viruses? Does it flip back to
SARS1 at some of these positions, etc.
[2021-09-21 08:26:48]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Yup.
[2021-09-21 08:27:39]
[Kristian Andersen]
I'll get some of this started later today - it's important to get the insights irrespective of what it's going to end up
showing.
[2021-09-21 08:28:55]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Would there be any reason to pick the SARS2 backbone for doing these? Assuming they had the genome sequence
way back at the start?
[2021-09-21 08:30:30]
[Kristian Andersen]
Well, in the grant they specifically talk about *new* viruses - so a SC2 precursor could have been one of those "low
risk" viruses they talk about and then they started fiddling with it.
[2021-09-21 08:34:27]
[Andrew Rambaut]
They would have selected it from candidates by genome sequencing it. I guess they would have seen an ACE-2
binding RBD and thought that is the one to try an FCS in?
[2021-09-21 08:37:08]
[Andrew Rambaut]
Or they just were selecting viruses by seeing if they could get any to culture and then worry about genome
sequencing?
[2021-09-21 08:48:58]
[Kristian Andersen]
The former - which is the approach they describe in the grant.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/1000
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:10428 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 999–1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10429 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10430 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10431 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10432 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10433 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10434 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10435 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10436 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10437 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10438 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |
| slack_pm:msg:10439 | 2021-09-21 | chat message | 1000 |