Reading Room Production — page 156
of 496 pages
← p.155 p.157 → · this page in the original PDF · package
ion
A number of HHS OpDivs and offices, including
any technical comments in the
ng the bill on behalf of NIH.
Please let me know if
w?
nd
fy?
US.
The draft bill would require the establishment of an independent life sciences research security board to review federal
funding for certain proposed life sciences research as defined by the bill. NIAID is mentioned briefly on page 4 in a section
describing limitations on membership of the board.
HHS reports that the Committee intends to consider the bill on July 24. A number of HHS OpDivs and offices, including
ASPR, CDC, and FDA, have been asked to review the bill along with NIH.
Action Item
By noon tomorrow, Friday July 12, please review the attached draft legislation and provide any technical comments in the
attached HHS TA template. Please note that NIH ORS/DOHS and NIH OSP are also reviewing the bill on behalf of NIH.
As you complete your review, please keep in mind the HHS guidance on technical assistance below. Please let me know if
you have any questions.
Thanks,
Sara
To ensure that the Department's comments are given full consideration, please observe the following guidelines in
providing your office's comments:
1. Are there provisions of this bill that would conflict with Department or Administration policy, and how?
2. Are there provisions that would pose difficulties for the operation or management of HHS programs, and
how?
3. Are there any other significant issues that you can identify?
4. If you recommend specific changes, supply reasons and explanations, if the reasons are not obvious.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/reading_room/156
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| URGENT ACTION by 12pm Friday 7/12: TA on Risky Research Review Act | 2024-07-11 | 155–158 |