NIH Hid Public Comments Package — page 120
of 128 pages
← p.119 p.121 → · this page in the original PDF · package
We do not have statistics as we don't have a way to measure that through
our analytics platforms. The only way to get that information is to count
manually. But for example, for the last 20 posts on NIH's Instagram, none
of which were related to animal testing, at least one PETA supporter
commented about animal testing on 16 out of 20 of those posts.
We have observed that most PETA related comments are on our
Instagram rather than our Facebook account. When PETA calls out NIH
publicly on their social media channels, which they do frequently (at least
a few times a month), it increases the number of PETA comments on our
posts. Below are recent examples of where they have tagged NIH's social
media channels to send their followers to our pages and their allegations
are inaccurate:
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CWJI4GLv4oZ/
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CWEnIJXvVKw/
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CVd2bQwPMYV/
•
https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/10160183334769586
•
https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/10160180615084586
•
https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/10160143308534586
•
Washington Post article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/11/19/faucibeagle-white-coat-waste/
Could you find specific examples of how PETA stands out among all other groups and
comments? We are looking for some extreme examples of PETA's comments where they go
over the top to highlight 2-3 examples with screenshots.
All of these posts/screenshots include extreme examples. As you can see, the NIH posts have
nothing to do with animal testing and include important information (ex. Alzheimer's caregiving
info, sickle cell anemia info) and the comments are extremely disruptive to the overall
information and conversation of the post.
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CVVrLYfsV3X/?utm medium=copy link
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CWLfu4JsV4j/?utm medium=copy link
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CT7qcxnJYVC/?utm medium=copy link
•
https://www.instagram.com/p/CVRUwPdthav/?utm medium=copy link
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/nih_public_comments/120
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| nih_public_comments:exh:00042 | — | attachment | 120 |