Attachment

We do not have statistics as we don't have a way to measure that through our analytics platforms. The only way to get that information is to count manually. But for example, for the last 20 posts on NIH's Instagram, none of which were related to animal testing, at least one PETA supporter commented about animal testing on 16 out of 20 of those posts. We have observed that most PETA related comments are on our Instagram rather than our Facebook account. When PETA calls out NIH publicly on their social media channels, which they do frequently (at least a few times a month), it increases the number of PETA comments on our posts. Below are recent examples of where they have tagged NIH's social media channels to send their followers to our pages and their allegations are inaccurate: • https://www.instagram.com/p/CWJI4GLv4oZ/ • https://www.instagram.com/p/CWEnIJXvVKw/ • https://www.instagram.com/p/CVd2bQwPMYV/ • https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/10160183334769586 • https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/10160180615084586 • https://www.facebook.com/official.peta/posts/10160143308534586 • Washington Post article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2021/11/19/faucibeagle-white-coat-waste/ Could you find specific examples of how PETA stands out among all other groups and comments? We are looking for some extreme examples of PETA's comments where they go over the top to highlight 2-3 examples with screenshots. All of these posts/screenshots include extreme examples. As you can see, the NIH posts have nothing to do with animal testing and include important information (ex. Alzheimer's caregiving info, sickle cell anemia info) and the comments are extremely disruptive to the overall information and conversation of the post. • https://www.instagram.com/p/CVVrLYfsV3X/?utm medium=copy link • https://www.instagram.com/p/CWLfu4JsV4j/?utm medium=copy link • https://www.instagram.com/p/CT7qcxnJYVC/?utm medium=copy link • https://www.instagram.com/p/CVRUwPdthav/?utm medium=copy link