Fauci Awards Package (Redacted) — page 44
of 136 pages
← p.43 p.45 → · this page in the original PDF · package
NOTICE: THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), ETHICS DIVISION IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S)
NAMES ABOVE AND MAY CONTAIN PROTECTED, PRIVILEGED, OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT SHOULD NOT BE TRANSMITTED TO UNAUTHORIZED ADDRESSEES.
IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR,
PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS. EMPLOYEE RECIPIENTS ARE COUNSELED THAT DISCIPLINARY ACTION FOR VIOLATING FEDERAL
ETHICS REGULATIONS MAY NOT BE TAKEN AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE WHO HAS ENGAGED IN CONDUCT IN GOOD FAITH RELIANCE UPON THE PRIOR ADVICE OF ANY
AGENCY ETHICS OFFICIAL, PROVIDED THAT THE EMPLOYEE HAS MADE FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES. IF EMPLOYEE CONDUCT IS POTENTIALLY
SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL SANCTIONS UNDER CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND RELATED STATUTES, RELIANCE OF THE ADVICE OF AN AGENCY ETHICS OFFICIAL IN
INTERPRETING THE SCOPE OF SUCH STATUTES IS A FACTOR THAT MAY BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN EXERCISING PROSECUTORIAL
DISCRETION. EMPLOYEES ARE CAUTIONED THAT DISCLOSURES TO AN OGC ATTORNEY ARE NOT PROTTECTED WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE. ALL EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING AGENCY ATTORNEYS, ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
From: Weaver, Gretchen (NIH/OD) [E]
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 10:46 AM
To: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E] <
@OD.NIH.GOV>; Hall, Randall (HHS/OGC) (
@hhs.gov)
<
@hhs.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci
Dr. Tabak:
Good morning. As a quick update on the status of this item, Randy and I talked and we have forwarded your note to OGE
with a request that they consider the questions presented. We will keep you apprised of what we hear. That said, we
have no idea when to expect a response given that OGE is heavily involved in working to bring the Biden team members
on board across the entire Executive Branch. We will, however, be checking in.
I am not turning to focus on the Dan David Prize.
Best,
Gretchen
Gretchen H. Weaver, J.D.
Supervisory/Senior NIH Ethics Counsel
DHHS/OGC/Ethics Division
phone:
fax:
NOTICE: THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC), ETHICS DIVISION IS INTENDED FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S)
NAMES ABOVE AND MAY CONTAIN PROTECTED, PRIVILEGED, OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION THAT SHOULD NOT BE TRANSMITTED TO UNAUTHORIZED ADDRESSEES.
IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR,
PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS. EMPLOYEE RECIPIENTS ARE COUNSELED THAT DISCIPLINARY ACTION FOR VIOLATING FEDERAL
ETHICS REGULATIONS MAY NOT BE TAKEN AGAINST ANY EMPLOYEE WHO HAS ENGAGED IN CONDUCT IN GOOD FAITH RELIANCE UPON THE PRIOR ADVICE OF ANY
AGENCY ETHICS OFFICIAL, PROVIDED THAT THE EMPLOYEE HAS MADE FULL DISCLOSURE OF ALL RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES. IF EMPLOYEE CONDUCT IS POTENTIALLY
SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL SANCTIONS UNDER CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND RELATED STATUTES, RELIANCE OF THE ADVICE OF AN AGENCY ETHICS OFFICIAL IN
INTERPRETING THE SCOPE OF SUCH STATUTES IS A FACTOR THAT MAY BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN EXERCISING PROSECUTORIAL
DISCRETION. EMPLOYEES ARE CAUTIONED THAT DISCLOSURES TO AN OGC ATTORNEY ARE NOT PROTTECTED WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE. ALL EMPLOYEES, INCLUDING AGENCY ATTORNEYS, ARE REQUIRED TO REPORT CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS TO THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.
From: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 5:51 AM
To: Hall, Randall (HHS/OGC) <
@HHS.GOV>
Cc: Weaver, Gretchen (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od.nih.gov>; Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od.nih.gov>
Subject: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci
Mr. Hall,
I write to request your concurrence that the exception to the gift prohibition at section 2635.204(d) does not prohibit Dr.
Anthony Fauci from accepting the cash prize associated with the National Academy of Medicine's (NAM) 2020 Gustav O.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/fauci_awards/44
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci | 2021-02-05 | 44–46 | |
| RE: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci | 2021-02-16 | 44 | |
| RE: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci | 2021-02-18 | 43–44 |