Fauci Awards Package (Redacted) — page 43
of 136 pages
← p.42 p.44 → · this page in the original PDF · package
From: "Jaffe, Holli Beckerman (NIH/OD) [E]" <
@od.nih.gov>
To: "Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]" <
@nih.gov>
Cc: "Schwetz, Tara (NIH/OD) [E]" <
@nih.gov>
Subject: FW: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:43:34 -0500
Importance: Normal
Had you sent Tony a copy of the request to OGE? If not, do you think it is worth sharing it with him now? While it wasn't
successful, it was a big and difficult effort. Perhaps he'll appreciate it. I suggested language with and without forwarding
your email to Randy.
Tony,
I write to inform you of the final decision regarding the cash prize associated with NAM's Lienhard Award. Unfortunately,
we were not successful in our appeal. While you can accept the honor of being named the 2020 Lienhard awardee, you
may not receive the cash. 1) For you information, below is the lengthy and detailed argument . . . or 2) We presented a
lengthy and detailed argument first to HHS's Office of the General Counsel (OGC) and then to the independent US Office
of Government Ethics (OGE) to persuade them that NAM's relationship with Government agencies is unique, and thus, an
award from NAM should be viewed differently than one bestowed by other non-profit corporations. However, neither
OGC nor OGE felt it was necessary to change their previous determination regarding NAM so that you would be permitted
to accept the cash prize under the applicable regulations.
I'm disappointed that we did not get a different decision. You are deserving of the additional recognition.
LAT
From: Hall, Randall (HHS/OGC) <
@hhs.gov>
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 4:47 PM
To: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Weaver, Gretchen (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od.nih.gov>
Subject: RE: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci
Dr. Tabak:
Good afternoon. This is to let you know that OGE has responded to our request to consider whether the gift rule
exception for awards applies in the case of the Lienhard Award the NAM presented to Dr. Fauci. Unfortunately, OGE has
concluded that the NASEM/NAM is/are a "person" under the government-wide rules restricting gifts from outside sources
and that they are a person that can be "substantially affected by the performance or non-performance" of Dr. Fauci's
duties. As a result, we are unable to change our prior determination that he cannot accept the $40,000 cash gift
associated with the Lienhard Award.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Randy
Randall J. Hall
Acting Associate General Counsel for Ethics
Alternate Designated Agency Ethics Official
Ethics Division
Department of Health and Human Services
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/fauci_awards/43
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci | 2021-02-18 | 43–44 | |
| FW: Request for concurrence -Gustav O. Lienhard Award -A. Fauci | 2021-02-23 | 43 |