Diary Prequel Package — page 18
of 465 pages · text recovered by OCR
← p.17 p.19 → · this page in the original PDF · package
April 13, 2001 -- There is a variable degree of hysteria going around with regard to the
apparent dichotomy between those who are pushing for treatment for HIV infection in
Africa and those who are pushing for treatment. I see no need for conflict. Obviously,
we need to do both. Below is an e-mail sent from Laurie Garrett (Pulitzer Prize winning
reported for Newsday) to AIDS activist Gregg Gonsalves. To me, it just shows the
hysteria of Garrett. I (as well as other of my colleagues) have always felt that she was a
lousy reporter...a good book writer, but a lousy reporter since she came to every
sto:
with her own agenda. Great for a book, but not for reporting.
any event, the
e-mail frames the ongoing feeling at the time.
Greetings.
Tam writing to you because I have leammed over the years that you are very
smart, insightful, and deeply concerned about the global HIV pandemic. I need
your help. I'm trying to understand what the hell is going on with the treatment
Vv prevention momentum now unfolding. Two enormously significant dates are
approaching, which will merit huge media attention paid to AIDS: the 20th
Anniversary of the original MMWR "gay plague" report, and the June special
session of the UN on HIV. As we near those dates, literally thousands of people
-- all, as far as I can tell, well intended --- are argueing over how best to
direct energies and as yet uncommitted billions of dollars for themajority of
the HIV+ people of the world, namely, those too poor to currently afford HAART.
Ihave received many Emails and phone calls, heard heated debates, and watched
tensions rise dramatically in recent weeks. Many of you are deeply upset. Some
of you have grasped onto the treatment access issue for Africa as fervently as
you once protested the Vietnam War, or fought the Reagan administration for AIDS
research funds and human rights.
As the observer --- the journalist --- I find the rancor distressing, but
genuine. I hear various sides claiming that others have ulterior motives, are
poor scientists, etc. But I don't think these charges are accurate or fair.
My sense is that all sides in these squabbles --- even many people working
inside the drug industry --- want to do the right thing. You just don't seem to
agree about what, exactly, the right thing is.
Today I got a particular angst-wrought message from Gregg Gonsavles, a long time
American HIV activist who has, of late, focused his considerable energies on the
global treatment access question. I wrote back to him, at length, and then
realized that the questions I was raising actually ought to be sent to you, as
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/diary_prequel/18
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 13, 2001 -- There is a variable degree of hysteria going around with regard to the | 2001-04-13 | diary entry | 18–23 |