Diary Prequel Package — page 174
of 465 pages
← p.173 p.175 → · this page in the original PDF · package
"There is not an immediate solution to the problem," Dr. Fauci said in an interview. But,
he also said, the budgetary constraints mean that "we are going to have to justify what we
are doing" and determine what steps to take after further discussions in smaller meetings
with researchers.
The reassessment comes after last September's widely publicized failure of what had
been the most promising candidate for an H.I.V. vaccine. Many health officials believe
that an effective vaccine would be the most crucial weapon in stopping the H.I.V.
pandemic.
Scientists do not have a full understanding of why the vaccine failed, or why it was
possibly harmful, in two large trials in the United States and South Africa. Dr. Fauci's
institute helped pay for the trials of the vaccine, which was made by Merck. Such failures
have led a number of scientists to challenge the direction of federal H.I.V. research.
On Tuesday, the AIDS Health Care Foundation called for the suspension of money for
H.I.V. vaccine research and reallocating resources into effective H.I.V./AIDS prevention,
testing and treatment strategies.
But Dr. Fauci strongly rejected the proposal. "Under no circumstances will we stop AIDS
vaccine research," Dr. Fauci said at the conclusion of the meeting.
Dr. James Hoxie of the University of Pennsylvania echoed the belief of many other
participants by saying, "we are not close to having a vaccine" and "there is a tremendous
need for innovation" in developing one.
Experts at the meeting also said that Dr. Fauci's agency needed to support efforts to
further develop animal models of human H.I.V. The experts also urged greater
cooperation between AIDS scientists who work on such animal models and those who
are trying to develop an H.I.V. vaccine for humans.
A crucial issue is supporting younger researchers to replace the cadre of veteran AIDS
scientists, many of whom are working beyond traditional retirement age. Dr. Fauci said a
first step would be to pare existing projects to immediately provide $10 million to $15
million for about 30 grants to be awarded to scientists who propose novel ideas. Some of
the grants would be used to support young researchers, he said.
Some scientists support conducting large vaccine trials in humans before all the fine
points of the vaccine research are complete in animals because of the urgency of the
pandemic.
Others urge caution out of fear that failures could destroy confidence among uninfected
people most at risk who would be needed as volunteers in future trials.
Equally vocal groups call for testing everything as soon as the research shows promise
because of the urgent need for a vaccine.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/diary_prequel/174
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rethinking Is Urged on a Vaccine for AIDS | 2008-03-25 | article | 173–175 |