Rethinking Is Urged on a Vaccine for AIDS
Diary Prequel Package, pp.173-175 · diary_prequel:article:00002
Page text: p.173, p.174, p.175 · original PDF
- Date
- 2008-03-25 00:00 (day precision)
- Type
- article · publication
- author
- Lawrence K. Altman
Rethinking Is Urged on a Vaccine for AIDS
By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN
WASHINGTON -- Researchers must go back to the drawing board before they can
develop an effective vaccine against H.I.V., AIDS experts said at a scientific meeting on
Tuesday.
And Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the top federal official responsible for AIDS research, agreed
that more fundamental knowledge is needed about H.I.V. and the way the body and
experimental vaccines respond to it before the goal of a licensed H.I.V. vaccine can be
reached. Dr. Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, pledged to re-evaluate the use of all $1.5 billion his agency spends on AIDS
research to come up with the necessary money.
"Everything is on the table," Dr. Fauci said at the one-day meeting, a Town Hall-type
discussion for vaccine researchers on how best to spend federal H.I.V. vaccine money in
light of a budget that has been flat for several years.
"There is not an immediate solution to the problem," Dr. Fauci said in an interview. But,
he also said, the budgetary constraints mean that "we are going to have to justify what we
are doing" and determine what steps to take after further discussions in smaller meetings
with researchers.
The reassessment comes after last September's widely publicized failure of what had
been the most promising candidate for an H.I.V. vaccine. Many health officials believe
that an effective vaccine would be the most crucial weapon in stopping the H.I.V.
pandemic.
Scientists do not have a full understanding of why the vaccine failed, or why it was
possibly harmful, in two large trials in the United States and South Africa. Dr. Fauci's
institute helped pay for the trials of the vaccine, which was made by Merck. Such failures
have led a number of scientists to challenge the direction of federal H.I.V. research.
On Tuesday, the AIDS Health Care Foundation called for the suspension of money for
H.I.V. vaccine research and reallocating resources into effective H.I.V./AIDS prevention,
testing and treatment strategies.
But Dr. Fauci strongly rejected the proposal. "Under no circumstances will we stop AIDS
vaccine research," Dr. Fauci said at the conclusion of the meeting.
Dr. James Hoxie of the University of Pennsylvania echoed the belief of many other
participants by saying, "we are not close to having a vaccine" and "there is a tremendous
need for innovation" in developing one.
Experts at the meeting also said that Dr. Fauci's agency needed to support efforts to
further develop animal models of human H.I.V. The experts also urged greater
cooperation between AIDS scientists who work on such animal models and those who
are trying to develop an H.I.V. vaccine for humans.
A crucial issue is supporting younger researchers to replace the cadre of veteran AIDS
scientists, many of whom are working beyond traditional retirement age. Dr. Fauci said a
first step would be to pare existing projects to immediately provide $10 million to $15
million for about 30 grants to be awarded to scientists who propose novel ideas. Some of
the grants would be used to support young researchers, he said.
Some scientists support conducting large vaccine trials in humans before all the fine
points of the vaccine research are complete in animals because of the urgency of the
pandemic.
Others urge caution out of fear that failures could destroy confidence among uninfected
people most at risk who would be needed as volunteers in future trials.
Equally vocal groups call for testing everything as soon as the research shows promise
because of the urgent need for a vaccine.
Nature who is
Dr. Warner C. Greene, a co-chairman of the meeting and director of the Gladstone
Institute of Virology and Immunology in San Francisco, said he hoped that a century
from now, historians looking back on the AIDS pandemic would view Tuesday's meeting
as a turning point.