Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted) — page 102
of 155 pages
← p.101 p.103 → · this page in the original PDF · package
DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com
receptors, and the role of the furin cleavage site in the
ability of that virus to replicate and cause disease,
before you do anything about moving it into another strain.
So there was a huge amount of data that would be available
to say this could be safe or we shouldn't do this.
MS. SALAZAR: So is it only gain-of-function in that
scenario if you know it's --
DR. BARIC: Well, again, you're dealing with -- okay.
So prior to 2015 paper, we had little if any evidence to
indicate that any bat sarbecovirus was capable of
replicating efficiently on the human receptor, especially
in the context of a primary cell derived from the lung, the
airways of a human. And so there was no data to support
the idea that these were important threat viruses. After
that paper, it said that there are threat viruses, followed
by the WIV1 paper, that said there are threat viruses in
nature, in bats, that can have the potential to cause
serious human disease. We don't know for sure.
A good example of this is there are strains that use
the DPP4, no, let's say the ACE2 receptor of SARS
coronavirus, and you put them in K18 mice that overexpress
that ACE2 molecule, you can find genome equivalents but no
live virus. In other words, the virus gets in, it makes a
bunch of those progeny RNA molecules, but it doesn't make
any progeny viruses so it can't spread.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/baric_ti/102
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| baric_ti:utt:00875 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 101–102 |
| baric_ti:utt:00876 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 102 |
| baric_ti:utt:00877 | 2026-04-10 | transcript segment | 102–103 |