A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Thanks Michelle - I agree with your plan we should handle this. We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our conversations with OMA. Best, Mike Note: This conversation is restricted, so you might not be able to cut or copy from it. See the information above the To line for more details. Also, while the conversation is restricted, the conversation owner can send the message to other people.
-
Thanks Michelle - I agree with your plan we should handle this. We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our conversations with OMA. Best, Mike Note: This conversation is restricted, so you might not be able to cut or copy from it. See the information above the To line for more details. Also, while the conversation is restricted, the conversation owner can send the message to other people. 00) (e)" i > .0964-06 (E] > 1d just sent the following response to /0) ct is /o) ck is
-
We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our 50) (e)" > .0964-06 (E] > 1d just sent the following response to /o) ck is Thanks Michelle - I agree with your plan we should handle this. We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our conversations with OMA. Best, Mike Note: This conversation is restricted, so you might not be able to cut or copy from it. See the information above the To line for more details. Also, while the conversation is restricted, the conversation owner can send the message to other people.
-
Thanks Michelle - I agree with your plan we should handle this. We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our conversations with OMA. Best, Mike Note: This conversation is restricted, so you might not be able to cut or copy from it. See the information above the To line for more details. Also, while the conversation is restricted, the conversation owner can send the message to other people. 00) (e)" i > .0964-06 (E] > 1d just sent the following response to /0) ct is /o) ck is
-
2020-09-11 04:37
Michael Lauer
We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our 50) (e)" > .0964-06 (E] > 1d just sent the following response to /o) ck is Thanks Michelle - I agree with your plan we should handle this. We might also want to include OGC / Anna Jacobs in our conversations with OMA. Best, Mike Note: This conversation is restricted, so you might not be able to cut or copy from it. See the information above the To line for more details. Also, while the conversation is restricted, the conversation owner can send the message to other people.
-
Mike, Just to provide you with an update on this one. Mike Shannon went to NIAIDs Deputy Director last evening to note that Emily was being "non-responsive" so the issue would be escalated. Emily said that as soon as the Deputy Director figured out which grant was involved, they knew that Emily had acted appropriately, and that OMA should be trusting her professional judgement. The Deputy Director is meeting with Mike Shannon today to discuss. You were not included in the emails from Mike Shannon at any point, not even as a FYI. Really happy that NIAID leadership supported Emily--huge in this case. Just want you know what's going on in this space and the fact that Mike is meeting w/the Deputy Director today. Thanks, Michelle
-
Mike, Just to provide you with an update on this one. Mike Shannon went to NIAIDs Deputy Director last evening to note that Emily was being "non-responsive" so the issue would be escalated. Emily said that as soon as the Deputy Director figured out which grant was involved, they knew that Emily had acted appropriately, and that OMA should be trusting her professional judgement. The Deputy Director is meeting with Mike Shannon today to discuss. You were not included in the emails from Mike Shannon at any point, not even as a FYI. Really happy that NIAID leadership supported Emily--huge in this case. Just want you know what's going on in this space and the fact that Mike is meeting w/the Deputy Director today. Thanks, Michelle
-
Mike, Just to provide you with an update on this one. Mike Shannon went to NIAIDs Deputy Director last evening to note that Emily was being "non-responsive" so the issue would be escalated. Emily said that as soon as the Deputy Director figured out which grant was involved, they knew that Emily had acted appropriately, and that OMA should be trusting her professional judgement. The Deputy Director is meeting with Mike Shannon today to discuss. You were not included in the emails from Mike Shannon at any point, not even as a FYI. Really happy that NIAID leadership supported Emily--huge in this case. Just want you know what's going on in this space and the fact that Mike is meeting w/the Deputy Director today. Thanks, Michelle
-
Mike, Just to provide you with an update on this one. Mike Shannon went to NIAIDs Deputy Director last evening to note that Emily was being "non-responsive" so the issue would be escalated. Emily said that as soon as the Deputy Director figured out which grant was involved, they knew that Emily had acted appropriately, and that OMA should be trusting her professional judgement. The Deputy Director is meeting with Mike Shannon today to discuss. You were not included in the emails from Mike Shannon at any point, not even as a FYI. Really happy that NIAID leadership supported Emily--huge in this case. Just want you know what's going on in this space and the fact that Mike is meeting w/the Deputy Director today. Thanks, Michelle