Reading Room Production, p.100 · reading_room:email:00105
Page text: p.100 · original PDF
- Date
- — (unknown precision)
- Type
- email · email
h 13, 2022 7:36 PM EDT
To: jbloom
fredhutch.org>
i
os
wh.iov.cn>; huben Bow iov.cn>; Hongying Li <aecohealthalliance.org>; Peter Daszak
ecohealthalliance.org>
Subject: Re: RaTG13 sequence?
No. I still believe it is naturally weak ACE2-usage, reflecting a trend of evolution.
-- ELLA
--
BEX
Bloom PhD, Jesse Do tredhutch.org>
BA
2022470313 21:44
WEA BE oh .icv.cn
own iov.cn>
PIKE
zishi<Owh jov.cn>, hubenfOwh .iov.cn>, Hongying LifJ@ecohealthalliance.org>, Peter Daszak-{E@ ecohealthalliance.org>
B= oil
Re: RaTG13 sequence?
Hi Peng,
In terms of the other receptor, do you mean the receptor for the RBD clade containing viruses like Rf1 and HKU3? (The ones shown
in orange in Figure 1 here?) I obviously agree finding the receptor for that clade is important. But since RaTG13 phylogenetically
clusters far more closely with other ACE2-binding viruses and does have modest ACE2 affinity for some ACE2s (like human and
mouse), then I'd be very surprised if it isn't ACE2-utilizing.
Or do you mean maybe there is some unknown secondary receptor even among strong ACE2 binding viruses not in the Rf1
/ HKU3
clade?
--Jesse
Jesse Bloom
Professor, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute