COVID-19 Records

Email

Reading Room Production, pp.58-60 · reading_room:email:00077

Page text: p.58, p.59, p.60 · original PDF

Date
(unknown precision)
Type
email · email
to
Alice Latinne
Topics
EcoHealth Alliance funding and grantsFurin cleavage site and molecular features
ecohealthalliance.org> CC: Hongying Li ecohealthalliance.org>; 41EAS low iov.cn>; Peter Daszak <E @ ccohealthalliance.org> Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript Oh I see. It is named 4991 when submitted earlier as a partial sequence. We renamed it as RaTG13 when we publish as a full-length sequence. So it would be OK. Only the deletion of "we" in the sentence will be enough. Best AE X::"Alice Latinne" ecohealthalliance.org> ACEI [A):2020-04-05 18:01:25 (2HIA) WEA: "AAR" wh.iov.cn> 1%: "Hongying Li" ecohealthalliance.org>, "4Q1EAN" Blows iov.cn>, "Peter Daszak" ecohealthalliance.org> =F gil: Re: Re: Re: China Maps used in the manuscript Hi Ben, 1) RaTG13 is not included in the Figure 3. The closest sequence is a sequence from GenBank (KP876546) and published in 2016 in a paper from your lab: Ge X-Y, Wang N, Zhang W, Hu B, Li B, Zhang Y-Z, Zhou J-H, Luo C-M, Yang X-L, Wu L-J, et al. (Ge2016 co-authors). 2016. Coexistence of multiple coronaviruses in several bat colonies in an abandoned mineshaft. Virologica Sinica 31:3140. This sequence is 100% identical to RaTG13, is it the same sample? I'll delete the word "we" in the sentence. 2) I'll check and correct this as needed. Cheers, Alice