COVID-19 Records

Email

NIH Hid Public Comments Package, pp.83-84 · nih_public_comments:email:00076

Page text: p.83, p.84 · original PDF

Date
2021-12-08 20:57
Type
email · email
cc
Crystal Spruill, Scott Prince, Nate ~ I Lankford
sender
Amanda Fine
to
Sarah J. Imhoff, Anna Kern

This text appears inside a quoted reply chain — it is evidence that the message was circulating, not necessarily a new message.

0limeni, Lydia OD) [E] nate (NIH/OD) [E] Lankford, ie, Amanda David (NIH/OD) [E] < @od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] < @mail.nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia (NIH/OD) [E] < @nih.gov> Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information Hi Sarah- So sorry for writing late. Crazy week for us! A call would be great, but we have another crazy day tomorrow and the best time that will work is 12:30-1pm. Will that work for you all as well? I'm attaching our responses to your comments in the stipulations document. I've included the answers to your questions below (highlighted). To answer your question about the key policy decision maker: that would be Renate. In terms of who has the most information to talk through the stipulation--that would be all of the OCPL people on this email. We each have different pieces of the information. My take away from the below explanation is that if we want to continue to moderate off topic comments on Facebook and Instagram, then we must decide to fight the lawsuit, and only if we win, then we could continue to do so. Is that accurate? Looking forward to the call. Thanks, Amanda