COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), pp.103-104 · baric_ti:utt:00887

Page text: p.103, p.104 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Christina Salazar, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Ralph S. Baric
Topics
Furin cleavage site and molecular features
It would depend on the outcomes of all the earlier experiments, right. So remember, one of those DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com experiments was to take the virus that had the furin cleavage site in it, resurrect that virus, put it in animals, see what the effect was. Remove the furin cleavage site, see what the effect was. If the furin cleavage site is driving a massive disease phenotype, then that results in a judgment question about whether you would do the next experiment. And it also would then demand the importance of having it reviewed before you proceeded.

Extracted statements

Rule-extracted, not adjudicated. The grade says what may be done with each one; read the document above before relying on any of them.

StatementGradeAttributionStance
So remember, one of those DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com experiments was to take the virus that had the furin cleavage site in it, resurrect that virus, put it in animals, see what the effect was. own voice, substantive speaker_own asserts
Remove the furin cleavage site, see what the effect was. needs context speaker_own asserts
If the furin cleavage site is driving a massive disease phenotype, then that results in a judgment question about whether you would do the next experiment. quoted / not their view hypothetical conditional framing asserts

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Yes.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    -- is that gain-of-function?
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Um --
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Because do you know what is --
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric
    It would depend on the outcomes of all the earlier experiments, right. So remember, one of those DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com experiments was to take the virus that had the furin cleavage site in it, resurrect that virus, put it in animals, see what the effect was. Remove the furin cleavage site, see what the effect was. If the furin cleavage site is driving a massive disease phenotype, then that results in a judgment question about whether you would do the next experiment. And it also would then demand the importance of having it reviewed before you proceeded.
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Okay.
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    Before you proceed.
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    So are you saying that we can never say whether a grant proposal was proposing to do gain-of13 function until we get all the way up to the point where you actually almost do it?
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    No. I'm saying in the context of a grant proposal where the agency asks you specifically to learn, down to the nucleotide level, what causes the phenotype, yes, you do all those experiments.

Full conversation →