COVID-19 Records

Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), pp.55-56 · baric_ti:utt:00433

Page text: p.55, p.56 · original PDF

Date
2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type
transcript segment · interview
recipient
Christina Salazar, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker
Ralph S. Baric
They may not be aware they had the DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com documents at the time. But if I gave the impression that they didn't have the documents, that's probably not correct.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

  1. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    -- notify NIH, and then yes, have a discussion about what to do, including destruction of viruses. I don't know if they implemented that as a policy or not. They might well have, because one of my documents would have been one of the first ones that they reviewed. Against, that's a decision that NIH has to come up with, not me.
  2. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    And I think they did. But, you know, I think -- and that's a question that we have is, is it appropriate or not. It sounds like NIH didn't even keep documents of those interactions.
  3. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    I think that's probably a misstatement on your part.
  4. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Okay.
  5. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric
    They may not be aware they had the DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com documents at the time. But if I gave the impression that they didn't have the documents, that's probably not correct.
  6. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Okay.
  7. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    There seemed to be the upper administration didn't know where the documents were.
  8. 2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open
    Okay. Have they tried to find them?
  9. 2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open
    How would I know? I would hope they would.

Full conversation →