Transcript segment

Baric Transcribed Interview (Redacted), p.55 · baric_ti:utt:00430

Date: 2026-04-10 09:00 (day precision)
Type: transcript segment · interview
recipient: Ralph S. Baric, Harry Kazenoff, David T. Lambeth III, William Henderson, Clark Ervin, Jake Greenberg
speaker: Christina Salazar

And I think they did. But, you know, I think -- and that's a question that we have is, is it appropriate or not. It sounds like NIH didn't even keep documents of those interactions.

In context

A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.

2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

Did NIH ever adopt your language that you had provided to them on stopped work and at what point you would have to?
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

Oh, are you talking about parameters that we might use to determine whether we would pause the research in place --
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

Right.
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

-- notify NIH, and then yes, have a discussion about what to do, including destruction of viruses. I don't know if they implemented that as a policy or not. They might well have, because one of my documents would have been one of the first ones that they reviewed. Against, that's a decision that NIH has to come up with, not me.
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar

And I think they did. But, you know, I think -- and that's a question that we have is, is it appropriate or not. It sounds like NIH didn't even keep documents of those interactions.
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

I think that's probably a misstatement on your part.
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

Okay.
2026-04-10 09:00 Ralph S. Baric open

They may not be aware they had the DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com documents at the time. But if I gave the impression that they didn't have the documents, that's probably not correct.
2026-04-10 09:00 Christina Salazar open

Okay.

Full conversation →