A single line often inverts meaning once you see what it
answers, so neighbouring messages are always shown.
-
Okay. Was that the only USAID -- I mean, part of this is it's hard for us to understand, too, because it seems like there are different funding streams that all contribute, for very different work, and, you know, I don't know if you're familiar with my boss's questions to Samantha Power on this, but he asked her if USAID funding had ever -- let's see, I have it here. I don't want to misstate it -- I mean, he said, "Does USAID fund gain-of-function research? We have no evidence that USAID has funded gain-of-function research, and we certainly have not authorized gain-of-function research." Then Senator Paul talked about the paper, and her response was that she just said, unequivocally, that USAID has not authorized gain-of-function research. Do you agree with DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com her statement?
-
I don't know what was in this grant. My guess is that USAID paid for surveillance work that picked up samples that ultimately were used with, you know, in terms of sequence discovery and that sort of thing that we used, and they wanted to acknowledge the fact that the discovery portion of the grant, that that contributed to the discovery portion of the grant. But again, this is not my grant, and it's not in the RO1 that they had with Daszak and Shi were not my grant, so I don't know the intricacies of what was in each and why they felt it was appropriate.
-
In the paper there is a section that makes it clear that the work was done prior to the pause. Is that right?
-
Prior to what?
-
2026-04-10 09:00
Christina Salazar
Prior to the pause.
-
Yes, that's correct.
-
Why was that statement included? Was it because there was a concern that it could be perceived that there was gain-of-function work occurring after the pause?
-
I don't recall the exact reason why we put that statement in. It may have been because the journal wanted it written in that it was started prior to the pause. It's technically accurate and honest, and I think that's the most important thing for the reason why the DC.Scheduling@LexitasLegal.com statement is in the paper.
-
Was all the work done before the pause, or was it that it was --