Slack / Private Message Drop — page 778
of 1123 pages
← p.777 p.779 → · this page in the original PDF · package
SLACK_000992
[Eddie Holmes]
[thread - ID: 2021-05-11 13:57:25]
@Andrew Rambaut did you look at the gamey taste price list in that figure I sent? Some great BBQ opportunities.
[Eddie Holmes]
Dominic's view on that Science letter - which I suspect is the WHO teams view - is that it is lightweight and has no
understanding of how things work in China
[Kristian Andersen]
The letter is hopelessly naive.
[Eddie Holmes]
Hopelessly
[Robert Garry]
I could be wrong but from what I gather few have any idea what it's like to work in any foreign country whatsoever
(unless you count North Carolina).
[Robert Garry]
Certainly most are naive when it comes to outbreaks....but very disappointed that Worobey decided to go FOMO.
[Andrew Rambaut]
[thread - ID: 2021-05-11 13:57:25]
@Eddie Holmes Yes. Centipede tastes just like shrimp I have heard (probably).
[Eddie Holmes]
They will come to regret this.
[Robert Garry]
*a liitlre cleanerEarly appearance of two distinct genomic lineages of SARS-CoV-2 in different Wuhan wildlife
markets suggests SARS-CoV-2 has a natural origin*
Robert F. Garry1.2
*Introduction*
Our previous commentary on the Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2 (Andersen et al., 2020) concluded that,
"SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus." The possibility of a laboratory
release or Lab Leak was also considered, but it was determined that a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2 is much more
likely. Recently, a team of scientists under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO) reached similar
conclusions (WHO, 2021). Other groups have speculated that SARS-CoV-2 may be the result of undisclosed
research on SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor and accidental release [Relman, 2020; Butler et al., 2021]. It has
also been suggested that SARS-CoV-2 may be the product of laboratory passage of a progenitor virus in cell culture
or animals, or Gain-of-Function research. New data presented by the WHO study provides clear findings in support
of the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/778
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:08123 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 777–778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08124 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08125 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08126 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08127 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08128 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08129 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08130 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08131 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778 |
| slack_pm:msg:08132 | 2021-05-11 | chat message | 778–779 |