COVID-19 Records

Slack / Private Message Drop — page 669

of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000883

← p.668 p.670 → · this page in the original PDF · package

BTW @Kristian Andersen is killing it re the nonYan report on that social media platform. Keep it up! The ref to Alina's paper was gold! [2021-04-01 05:22:31] [Robert Garry] And to Kristian's tweets, "The Rooting Problem" is something we talked about before - even going back to one of Eddie's first Aussie seminar's. The fact that A and/or B show up in different markets is important. [2021-04-01 05:58:05] [Robert Garry] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00877-4 [2021-04-01 05:59:00] [Robert Garry] More good work @Eddie Holmes [2021-04-01 11:26:31] [Kristian Andersen] Thank you! https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/01/opinions/who-covid-19-origins-report-opinion-kavanagh/index.html [2021-04-01 11:44:27] [Kristian Andersen] Agreed on the Nature article - a lot of good quotes from Eddie and it's clear our man is the only one who really gets it. "The priority should be to "follow the animals", starting at the Huanan market" - :100:, can't stress this enough. David is typically good, but I have seen a lot of quotes like this "The details in the report were helpful, but didn't include much new information, says David Robertson" and it really bothers me - there's a ton of new stuff in the report and that just isn't highlighted enough. Sure, it doesn't answer the *big* question about origins, but it never could - but that doesn't mean it didn't add a lot of new knowledge and data. It clearly did - if you take the ten hours required to read it in detail.... [2021-04-01 13:10:20] [Eddie Holmes] I agree - there's a ton in there. I've not finished going through it yet. The Yan report is hilarious. Deranged. Also good to see that Petrofsky is the go to idiot. [2021-04-01 13:31:32] [Kristian Andersen] I'm amazed Petrofsky is still being quoted - he's so dumb [2021-04-01 13:40:44] [Eddie Holmes] Dumb and conflicted because just wants to hype his vaccine that no one cares about. Isn't it funny that conflicts of interest only go one way? [2021-04-01 16:16:40] [Eddie Holmes] Just noticed this: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.657439/full [2021-04-01 16:18:10] [Andrew Rambaut] N gene fragments? [2021-04-01 16:20:50]

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/slack_pm/669

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
slack_pm:msg:07007 2021-04-01 chat message 668–669
slack_pm:msg:07008 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07009 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07010 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07011 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07012 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07013 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07014 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07015 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07016 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07017 2021-04-01 chat message 669
slack_pm:msg:07018 2021-04-01 chat message 669–670