COVID-19 Records

Slack / Private Message Drop — page 661

of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000875

← p.660 p.662 → · this page in the original PDF · package

[2021-03-30 09:42:56] [Robert Garry] good lord [2021-03-30 09:48:17] [Kristian Andersen] "Gag order on scientists". What KIND of COUNTRY would do something like that? Geez. [2021-03-30 10:22:27] [Robert Garry] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/29/world/asia/china-virus-WHO-report.html "Jesse Bloom, an evolutionary biologist at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, said he was not convinced that a laboratory leak was extremely unlikely, after seeing a copy of the report.* *He said he agreed that it was highly plausible that the virus could have evolved naturally to spread to humans, but he did not see any reasoning in the report to dismiss the possibility of a lab escape." [2021-03-30 10:23:18] [Kristian Andersen] Jim is on my shit list from now on. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2021-03-30 at 10.23.00 AM.png] [2021-03-30 10:23:32] [Kristian Andersen] Not exactly the conclusion of the report now, is it? [2021-03-30 10:24:50] [Robert Garry] Meanwhile: [shared file(s): image.png] [2021-03-30 10:47:34] [Robert Garry] Tedros reponding in part to this 52 min ago US and 13 other nations express "shared concerns" about WHO study on Covid-19 origins From CNN's Jennifer Hansler The governments of the United States, Australia, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom jointly expressed concern about the World Health Organization (WHO) study into the origins of Covid-19 in China and called for independent and fully transparent evaluations with access to all relevant data in the future. > "We join in expressing shared concerns regarding the recent WHO-convened study in China, while at the same time reinforcing the importance of working together toward the development and use of a swift, effective, transparent, science-based, and independent process for international evaluations of such outbreaks of unknown origin in the future," Tuesday's joint statement said. "The mission of the WHO is critical to advancing global health and health security, and we fully support its experts and staff and recognize their tireless work to bring an end to the COVID-19 pandemic, including understanding how the pandemic started and spread. With such an important mandate, it is equally essential that we voice our shared concerns that the international expert study on the source of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was significantly delayed and lacked access to complete, original data and samples," the statement continued. "We note the findings and recommendations, including the need for further studies of animals to find the means of introduction into humans, and urge momentum for expert-driven phase 2 studies," the statement said. "Going forward, there must now be a renewed commitment by WHO and all Member States to access, transparency, and timeliness." The statement noted that in a "serious outbreak of an unknown pathogen with pandemic potential, a rapid, independent, expert-led, and unimpeded evaluation of the origins is critical to better prepare." The statement from the governments underscored "the need for a robust, comprehensive, and expert-led mechanism for expeditiously investigating outbreaks of unknown origin that is conducted with full and open collaboration among all stakeholders and in accordance with the principles of transparency, respect for privacy, and scientific and research integrity." [2021-03-30 10:47:36]

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/slack_pm/661

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
slack_pm:msg:06922 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06923 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06924 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06925 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06926 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06927 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06928 2021-03-30 chat message 661
slack_pm:msg:06929 2021-03-30 chat message 661–662