Slack / Private Message Drop — page 648

[2021-03-29 07:31:29] [Robert Garry] https://www.pnas.org/content/117/17/9241 How good is this analysis? [2021-03-29 07:32:22] [Robert Garry] Some new info - no Eddie raccoon dog though. [2021-03-29 07:37:48] [Robert Garry] THey only have one lineage A virus in their early cases.S13 EPI_ISL_529213 Visitor to another market 26 Dec 30 Dec 4946 (ORF1a), 8782 (ORF1a), 28144 (ORF8) S/A [2021-03-29 07:38:00] [Andrew Rambaut] [thread - ID: 2021-03-29 07:38:00] https://www.pnas.org/content/117/23/12522?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign= Proc_Natl_Acad_Sci_U_S_A_TrendMD_0 [2021-03-29 07:38:30] [Robert Garry] Seems like a missed opportunity with WA-1 [2021-03-29 07:41:02] [Robert Garry] [thread - ID: 2021-03-29 07:38:00] @Andrew Rambaut THANKS! - it didn't quite "smell" right to me, but I'm unqualified to judge specifically. [2021-03-29 07:42:39] [Robert Garry] *BIG QUESTION HERE*- lot's of media inquiries - can I boot some of these to !channel - if they are "worthy." By worthy I mean top tier outlets? [2021-03-29 07:43:54] [Robert Garry] [thread - ID: 2021-03-29 07:38:00] @Andrew Rambaut Forster is mentioned in the report in several spots... [2021-03-29 07:53:22] [Andrew Rambaut] [thread - ID: 2021-03-29 07:38:00] @Andrew Rambaut It also got 'communicated' by an AAS member that is in the same department as the authors. [2021-03-29 08:19:10] [Robert Garry] First impressions: 1. The report is very well done. Lot's of very detailed information some of which is new to me. Anyone that wants to claim that the report is lacking in details will be disappointed. I think that the onus on the lab leak proponents should be to focus on specifics as to what they feel was lacking in the report.