Slack / Private Message Drop — page 327
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_000541
← p.326 p.328 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[Eddie Holmes]
Was sent this - you may have seen it already: [shared file(s): KRISP_Minister_President_Briefing_Media.pdf]
[2020-12-19 15:24:02]
[Eddie Holmes]
[thread - ID: 2020-12-19 01:52:11]
@Andrew Rambaut Agreed. Seems the 2 NSW cases are likely from different families as they have different
surnames. Also, they are not in the community here. We have a new outbreak in NSW which we think is linked to
flight crew and that is lineage B.1. Phew.
[2020-12-19 17:14:10]
[Robert Garry]
Off channel most of the day - Jeanette had a minor procedure yesterday and I had a few home items. Yes I can take
a look. Both E484K and N501Y are pretty dramatic. One think for sure is that there is considerable plasticity in the
RBD-ACE2 interactons.
[2020-12-19 17:36:37]
[Eddie Holmes]
Vince is such a plonker.
[2020-12-19 18:02:41]
[Kristian Andersen]
Does he _ever_ get it right?
[2020-12-19 19:53:31]
[Eddie Holmes]
Not that I've seen.
[2020-12-20 07:28:32]
[Robert Garry]
[thread - ID: 2020-12-20 07:28:32]
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.16.384743v1.full.pdf A couple of initial thoughts on the RBD
changes. First, just to reiterate the dirty little "secret" of structural biologists - everything including cryoEM and X-ray
crystallography are models - the resolutions are average and locally there is a lot of "fitting." That being said this
figure from the Bullocks mink paper shows the residues in question E484 not to far from f486 obviously. Remarkable
that N501 shows up in both the mink and the mouse. [shared file(s): image.png]
[2020-12-20 07:28:36]
[Robert Garry]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2772-0
[2020-12-20 07:54:02]
[Robert Garry]
Benton et al. is going to be the key to interpreting the NTD deletions and probably the other elephant mutations as
well. A pretty good interpretation of D614G therein. More importantly it clear that *both* NTD and the RBD need to
undergo dramatic shifts that are driven by ACE2 binding to accommodate the S1/S2 and S2' cleavages and
ultimately the large scale rearrangement of S2 into the 6 helix bundle. This doesn't rule out an NTD "receptor." I
need to get to the office to look at the structures in Benton in a bit more detail to see what del69-70 etc do to the
Benton structures, but it won't surprise me if they don't "destabilize" the trimer ala Doug.
[2020-12-20 07:59:39]
[Andrew Rambaut]
[thread - ID: 2020-12-20 07:28:32]
@Robert Garry I don't think 501Y turns up in mink.
[2020-12-20 08:12:29]
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/327
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:03435 | 2020-12-19 | chat message | 326–327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03436 | 2020-12-19 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03437 | 2020-12-19 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03438 | 2020-12-19 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03439 | 2020-12-19 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03440 | 2020-12-19 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03441 | 2020-12-20 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03442 | 2020-12-20 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03443 | 2020-12-20 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03444 | 2020-12-20 | chat message | 327 |
| slack_pm:msg:03445 | 2020-12-20 | chat message | 327–328 |