Slack / Private Message Drop — page 1087
of 1123 pages · Bates SLACK_001301
← p.1086 p.1088 → · this page in the original PDF · package
Her latest on Jeremy is def in libel territory. [shared file(s): Screen Shot 2022-02-05 at 11.31.05 AM.png, Screen
Shot 2022-02-05 at 11.30.45 AM.png, Screen Shot 2022-02-05 at 11.30.23 AM.png]
[2022-02-05 08:07:26]
[Kristian Andersen]
It's been particularly nasty over the last month. Completely out of line and very clearly mis- and disinformation.
[2022-02-05 08:25:39]
[Kristian Andersen]
Also - NIAID Centers focused on preventing lab infections? Lol - come on - that really is an amazing display of
ignorance. :rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:
[2022-02-05 08:59:29]
[Robert Garry]
Too bad Eric is not still at the Broad - he could read her the riot act - professionally of course.
[2022-02-08 04:34:45]
[Robert Garry]
@Kristian Andersen I remember this episode differently. Posting for archiving purposes. I am tempted [but I won't] to
shoot Todd Frankel an email though. [shared file(s): Fair Eric Lander.png]
[2022-02-08 04:37:51]
[Robert Garry]
The other CF tweet [shared file(s): Fair Todd Frankel.png]
[2022-02-08 07:18:36]
[Kristian Andersen]
Load of bollocks - as per usual...
[2022-02-08 09:03:36]
[Robert Garry]
Notice that he's communicating with the Politico reporter, no doubt hoping to rerun the smear he was selling to his
Freetown buddy Todd..
[2022-02-10 02:04:51]
[Robert Garry]
saving this here [shared file(s): Christian Drosten rejects allegations of cover-up.pdf]
[2022-02-10 02:17:07]
[Eddie Holmes]
Fascinating. I don't like the way it has mixed our paper with the Lancet letter.
[2022-02-10 07:34:23]
[Kristian Andersen]
Drosten didn't know about the research at the WIV? That's hard to believe - plus, of course, we discussed it on the
conference call...
[2022-02-11 17:41:04]
[Kristian Andersen]
For my meeting on Monday, I was wondering if I should propose that all our institutions get together to make a joint
statement to really push back on this? Might work quite well - and we would have minimal involvement.
[2022-02-11 18:07:48]
[Eddie Holmes]
It would but we would also need to include Butt Lesion and that means talking to him etc
I'm still strongly inclined to do nothing in response to the letter but a media release if necessary
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/slack_pm/1087
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| slack_pm:msg:11312 | 2022-02-05 | chat message | 1086–1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11313 | 2022-02-05 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11314 | 2022-02-05 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11315 | 2022-02-05 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11316 | 2022-02-08 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11317 | 2022-02-08 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11318 | 2022-02-08 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11319 | 2022-02-08 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11320 | 2022-02-10 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11321 | 2022-02-10 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11322 | 2022-02-10 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11323 | 2022-02-11 | chat message | 1087 |
| slack_pm:msg:11324 | 2022-02-11 | chat message | 1087 |