Reading Room Production — page 354
of 496 pages
← p.353 p.355 → · this page in the original PDF · package
[
JJ erred in pointing you
t
ur domain and frankly, not a
r NIH staff who
d learn about
litics around
you have a
ony sent me
n detail to the
[ should
I reached out,
ve mentioned
oved to
Richard thinks
aying anything
Ok, thanks. Will deflect. I was not asking to be involved in this stuff - it
was just meant to be a casual conversation with one of our detailees...
Rajesh
On 11/18/10 9:14 PM, "Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E]"
@nih.gov
wrote:
Thanks for asking. My knee jerk reaction is to support your misgivings. I
> think it is a bad idea for a whole bunch of reasons. JJ erred in pointing you
to the white house. Protocol dictates that we don't talk to the white house
> without going through hhs. It would be okay to yak with one of our detailees
but this has taken a turn. Plus, I suspect you know next to nothing about
> biosecurity and BARDA. This is not really your domain and frankly, not a
central issue to NCTS at the outset. It IS the domain of other NIH staff who
> would probably be a little miffed about why you are suddenly in the middle of
their "space." NIAID has programs in this arena and you should learn about
> them but they ain't coming into to ncts at the get go and the politics around
biosecurity is complex.
>
I would suggest to Richard that the meeting be "delayed" until you have a
> better understanding of what Francis has in mind, yadda yadda.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
From: Ranganathan, Rajesh (NIH/OD) [C]
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 6:51 PM
To: Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E]
> Cc: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]
Subject: FW: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's
> Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI)
> Kathy:
> Some background for you (I was able to tell Larry in person)..Tony sent me
to JJ McGowan, who thought that Richard Hatchett, currently on detail to the
> White House is someone I should talk to because he might have the skill set
to help with NCTS. I checked in with Larry and we agreed that I should
> certainly meet such people and hear them out. So, when Richard reached out,
I agreed to go down to the EEOB to meet him. He appears to have mentioned
> that he is meeting me to Ms. Heidi Avery (Deputy Homeland Security Adviser
to the President), who now wants to join in and the meeting got moved to
> Monday to accommodate her schedule. Please see below for what Richard thinks
Ms. Avery wants to know.
>
Two issues: a) there is not much I can say about CAN or anything else re:
> NCTS on Monday, and b) as a contractor, I should not be reprenseting the NIH
externally. Larry has arranged from Robin from DPCPSI to go with me to
> ensure that the NIH is represented by an employee.
> But I am wondering if this meeting with Ms. Avery should even happen - feels
too early in the process Please advise on the ramifications of
> cancelling/postponing on her vs. taking the meeting and not saying anything
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/reading_room/354