COVID-19 Records

Reading Room Production — page 339

of 496 pages

← p.338 p.340 → · this page in the original PDF · package

MI. 'you We have an overlapping (and defense t you on MCMI (I From: "Ranganathan, Rajesh (NIH/OD) [C]" @nih.gov> To: "Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov>, "Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov> Subject: FW: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:30:16 -0500 Importance: Normal This is what I wrote back...I hope it strikes the right tone... R ------ Forwarded Message From: "Ranganathan, Rajesh (NIH/OD) [C]" @nih.gov Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:29:23 -0500 To: "Hatchett, Richard J." @nss.eop.gov Cc: "Burrus-Shaw, Cyndi (NIH/OD) [E]" < @nih.gov> Subject: Re: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Richard: We have discussed this internally amongst a subset of the exec. Team and the consensus is that it is too early for us to have a conversation about CAN, not yet having implemented anything related to CAN. Furthermore, I have only been here 2+ weeks and hence would be out of my depth with respect to MCMI. The main concern is that we would be wasting Ms. Avery's time. It would be unfortunate to risk any dampening of enthusiasm around what CAN could achieve by having a briefing at this high level prematurely. Would it be possible at this point to diplomatically request that the meeting with Ms. Avery be postponed to a later date, when we are in fact ready to brief her in a substantive way? And given that you are about to move to BARDA, would it make sense for you and I to chat once you get settled in that new role? However, if you feel that there would still be value in us talking now, I would be happy to come over on Monday to meet 1 on 1 with you. Please let me know what you think. Rajesh On 11/18/10 8:51 AM, "Hatchett, Richard J." @nss.eop.gov wrote: > Rajesh, > Sorry, I should have clarified that in our initial exchanges, as I assumed that was the context in which JJ spoke with you. We have an overlapping (and > in fact prior) interest in CAN because of the President's biodefense initiative, and I was taking advantage of JJ's intro to contact you on MCMI (I

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/reading_room/339

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
FW: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical email 339
reading_room:exh:00090 attachment 339
Re: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's 2010-11-18 email 339–340