COVID-19 Records

Reading Room Production — page 212

of 496 pages

← p.211 p.213 → · this page in the original PDF · package

[ JJ erred in pointing you t ur domain and frankly, not a r NIH staff who d learn about litics around From: "Kawazoe, Robin (NIH/OD) [E]" @mail.nih.gov> To: "Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov> Subject: Re: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:30:37 -0500 Importance: Normal Larry, Do you know what Raj means when he said he would "deflect?" Does that mean postpone the meeting? Robin ----- Original Message ----- From: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] To: Ranganathan, Rajesh (NIH/OD) [C]; Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E] Cc: Burrus-Shaw, Cyndi (NIH/OD) [E] Sent: Thu Nov 18 21:27:59 2010 Subject: RE: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Agree Thanks larry -----Original Message----- From: Ranganathan, Rajesh (NIH/OD) [C] Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:18 PM To: Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E] Cc: Tabak, Lawrence (NIH/OD) [E] Subject: Re: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Ok, thanks. Will deflect. I was not asking to be involved in this stuff - it was just meant to be a casual conversation with one of our detailees... Rajesh On 11/18/10 9:14 PM, "Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov wrote: Thanks for asking. My knee jerk reaction is to support your misgivings. I > think it is a bad idea for a whole bunch of reasons. JJ erred in pointing you to the white house. Protocol dictates that we don't talk to the white house > without going through hhs. It would be okay to yak with one of our detailees but this has taken a turn. Plus, I suspect you know next to nothing about > biosecurity and BARDA. This is not really your domain and frankly, not a central issue to NCTS at the outset. It IS the domain of other NIH staff who > would probably be a little miffed about why you are suddenly in the middle of their "space." NIAID has programs in this arena and you should learn about > them but they ain't coming into to ncts at the get go and the politics around biosecurity is complex.

This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The Committee's PDF is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned text: /api/page/reading_room/212

Records on this page

RecordDateTypePages
Re: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical email 212
RE: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's 2010-11-17 email 211–212
Re: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Ok, thanks. Will deflect. I was not asking to be involved in this stuff - it was just meant to be a casual conversation with one of our detailees... Rajesh On 11/18/10 9:14 PM, "Hudson, Kathy (NIH/OD) [E]" @nih.gov wrote: Thanks for asking. My knee jerk reaction is to support your misgivings. I > think it is a bad idea for a whole bunch of reasons. JJ erred in pointing you to the white house. Protocol dictates that we don't talk to the white house > without going through hhs. It would be okay to yak with one of our detailees but this has taken a turn. Plus, I suspect you know next to nothing about > biosecurity and BARDA. This is not really your domain and frankly, not a central issue to NCTS at the outset. It IS the domain of other NIH staff who > would probably be a little miffed about why you are suddenly in the middle of their "space." NIAID has programs in this arena and you should learn about > them but they ain't coming into to ncts at the get go and the politics around biosecurity is complex. you have a ony sent me n detail to the [ should I reached out, ve mentioned oved to Richard thinks aying anything We have an overlapping s biodefense > you on MCMI re JJ > I would suggest to Richard that the meeting be "delayed" until you have a > better understanding of what Francis has in mind, yadda yadda. > > > -----Original Message----- 2010-11-18 email 212–213
RE: Discussion about Cures Acceleration Network and the President's Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMI) Agree Thanks larry 2010-11-18 email 212