Reading Room Production — page 198

kely to ded questions below): d. Did 2re ding this? ovide any edits or comments. If these questions are better referred to NIH/NIAID) [E] jitional documentation or have any ew of the initial RO1 grant. nsive to this request. As you recall, NIH OLPA reached out recently to make us aware of congressional requests for documents related to Scientific Review Group (SRG) review of the original and renewal EHA award. NIH OLPA has indicated that HHS is likely to provide these to the congressional requestors later this week. NIH OLPA has drafted the attached "media statement" that notes a few potential vulnerabilities from comments in the summary statements. They have asked us if we have additional information on these points (bolded questions below): Vulnerabilities: 1. In the 2013 review, critique number 3 mentions that a potential overlap with PREDICT was noted. Does NIAID have additional information that we could share about how it was determined this was not double billing? 2. In the same critique, there is a note that the potential risk to human subjects is not fully addressed. Did NIAID work with the grantee to address these concerns before funding? 3. In the 2019 review, critique number 2 mentions that the letters from the two Chinese institutions were identical. Do you know if there was follow-up regarding this? Action Item By COB today, Tuesday March 21, please review the "media statement" document and provide any edits or comments. Please also provide any information responsive to the bolded questions above. If these questions are better referred to OER or other NIH components, please let us know. Thanks, Sara _____________________________________________ From: Selgrade, Sara (NIH/NIAID) [E] @nih.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 2:17 PM To: NIAID BUGS @niaid.nih.gov>; NIAID DEA DART @mail.nih.gov>; Linde, Emily (NIH/NIAID) [E] @mail.nih.gov> Cc: NIAID OCGR Leg @mail.nih.gov>; Auchincloss, Hugh (NIH/NIAID) [E] @niaid.nih.gov>; Harper, Jill (NIH/NIAID) [E] @niaid.nih.gov>; Billet, Courtney (NIH/NIAID) [E] @niaid.nih.gov>; Erbelding, Emily (NIH/NIAID) [E] @nih.gov>; Poe, Kelly (NIH/NIAID) [E] @nih.gov>; Gilles, Sharon (NIH/NIAID) [E] @nih.gov> Subject: Please advise by 10am tomorrow: Documents for congressional requests related to EHA grant Importance: High Hello all, Background As you may be aware, the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, as well as the House Energy and Commerce Committee, have requested documents related to EcoHealth Alliance's NIH grants. NIH OLPA has been working with NIH OER and others to provide documents responsive to the two requests outlined below. Please note the highlighted requests from NIH OLPA outlined below regarding these document productions. Action Item Please let us know by 10am tomorrow, Thursday March 9, if you know of any additional documentation or have any concerns to flag as requested by NIH OLPA. 1. Congressional Request: All documents related to the Scientific Review Group (SRG) review of the initial R01 grant. Note from OCGR-Leg: NIH OLPA/NIH OER has identified the two attached documents below responsive to this request. Please note that we suggested that OLPA should also consult with the Center for Scientific Review.