NIH Hid Public Comments Package — page 95
of 128 pages
← p.94 p.96 → · this page in the original PDF · package
/OD) [E]
Lankford,
>; Polimeni,
/OD) [E]
(o)
>)
nn
Lankford,
nate (NIH/OD) [E]
limeni, Lydia
))
1. Re: PETA on the NIH Twitter chat--can users see that whole Twitter chat? Plaintiffs claimed they may want
context for the complaints, but asserted they couldn't necessarily view the whole chat. Is that true? .
Yes, for the most part. Tweets from users with a public profile can be seen by anyone following the chat.
Tweets from users whose accounts are private would not be seen by everyone; only followers of a user
with a private account would be able to view their tweets. However, PETA's tweets directed at NIH and
the tweets complaining about PETA's disruptions are public. Here's the link to the chat with those
publicly available tweets: Full Twitter chat thread from 10/3/14 on brain health that was disrupted.
2. Please let me know your feedback and if you have any edits on the following paragraph concerning NIH's manual
moderation:
Once Plaintiffs' complaint was filed, NIH paused its efforts to manually hide comments consistent with
its comment moderation guidelines. Prior to this litigation, NIH did engage in manual comment hiding--
however, due to resource constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic, these efforts were limited--although it
principally relied upon its keyword filters to ensure compliance with its comment moderation guidelines.
If NIH had the resources to manually moderate its social media accounts on a more consistent basis, it
would have done so. NIH intends to resume manual comment moderation following a resolution of the
parties summary judgment motions, if consistent with the Court's order resolving those motions.
From: Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E]
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 11:53 AM
To: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] <
@nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Lankford,
David (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] <
@mail.nih.gov>; Polimeni,
Lydia (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Fine, Amanda (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Haley Spencer
<
@palladianpartners.com>
Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information
Hi Sarah,
Just confirming receipt and that we are working on these responses. Thanks!
Anna
From: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 5:09 PM
To: Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] <
@nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Lankford,
David (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] <
@mail.nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia
(NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Fine, Amanda (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Haley Spencer
<
@palladianpartners.com>
Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information
Hi Anna,
Thanks so much! We are getting close to finalizing the fact stipulation. Hopefully by Friday but possibly next week if
necessary. I have one needed clarification about Twitter, and would like your team to review some language about
manual moderation to see if you have any feedback or edits.
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/nih_public_comments/95
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2022-01-24 | 95–96 | |
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2022-01-25 | 95 | |
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2022-01-25 | 94–95 |