NIH Hid Public Comments Package — page 61
of 128 pages
← p.60 p.62 → · this page in the original PDF · package
OD) [E]
nate (NIH/OD) [E]
Lankford,
ie, Amanda
/OD) a:
Lankford,
ne, Amanda
>
Looking forward to the call.
Thanks,
Amanda
From: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 6:32 PM
To: Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] <
@nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Lankford,
David (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] <
@mail.nih.gov>; Fine, Amanda
(NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information
Hi,
I want to clarify my answer below to #1. I just heard from DOJ that they'd prefer holding on adding any new keywords to
the filter list for right now. It would be easier to just litigate with the universe we have, rather than change the facts at a
later stage. However, our fact stipulation will expressly reserve the right for NIH to add content neutral keyword filters to
capture posts that violate the comment guidelines in the future.
Please let me know if you have any further questions about this point.
Thank you,
Sarah J. Imhoff, JD, MHSA
Senior Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Public Health Division, NIH Branch
(direct)
@nih.gov
This e-mail message is intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above. It may contain information that is protected,
privileged, or confidential, and it should not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive such
information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you think you
have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
From: Imhoff, Sarah (NIH/OD) [E]
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 9:52 PM
To: Kern, Anna (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Cc: Spruill, Crystal (NIH/OD) [C] <
@nih.gov>; Prince, Scott (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Lankford,
David (NIH/OD) [E] <
@od31tm1.od.nih.gov>; Myles, Renate (NIH/OD) [E] <
@mail.nih.gov>; Fine, Amanda
(NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>; Polimeni, Lydia (NIH/OD) [E] <
@nih.gov>
Subject: RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information
Hi team,
I also reviewed the document you sent over and have a few follow-up responses/questions:
1. For the Instagram filters #stopanimaltesting, #stoptesting, and #stoptestingonanimals, NIH chose option #1- .
Remove the above filters and use a different neutral keyword hashtag to achieve the same effect to help stop the
barrage of comments from PETA, such as #testing or #animals, if this would work. You asked "Can we add filters in
the future as long as they're neutral?" Answer- As things currently stand with our litigation strategy, NIH can add
neutral filters now and in the future. If the court issues an injunction based on a ruling that NIH's social media
This is our OCR of the page, with running headers and footers removed. The
Committee's PDF
is authoritative; quote from it. Machine-readable, including the uncleaned
text: /api/page/nih_public_comments/61
Records on this page
| Record | Date | Type | Pages |
|---|---|---|---|
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2021-12-06 | 61–62 | |
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2021-12-08 | 61 | |
| RE: PETA Lawsuit Update and Requests for Information | 2021-12-08 | 60–61 |